My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
10-18-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:18:16 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 10:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/18/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 4, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson inquired about City liability if the Planning Commission approved the variance. <br />His concern is if the driveway does cross the property line and by granting the variance, would the <br />city be liable for any action taken by the neighbor. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller replied that the City does not require surveys when work is being done, <br />and that she spoke to the City Attorney who indicated that the City is not responsible for <br />determining where property lines are and it is up to the applicant to construct within their property <br />boundary. She stated, according to the City Attorney, it would be a civil matter if a property line <br />dispute ensued. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn reported he received the letter from Ms. Barb Benesch, Community <br />Development Administrative Assistant in response to the letter from the Fords attorney. He <br />asked, in looking at the letter and the application, what was the reason the driveway was not <br />listed under special conditions or the other specified areas on the application. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated this is the application that came in for the garage. She stated when <br />Administrative Assistant Benesch accepted the application, she looked at it as a garage permit only. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn stated the application included the driveway also and the letter alludes to the <br />fact Ms. Benesch had some recollection as to how close the driveway was to the property line. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated she could not speak to what happened at that time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked how the issue came to the City’s attention. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller replied that Mr. Jeremiah Anderson, Housing Inspector, received a call <br />about the driveway being on the property line. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked who installed the fence. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller replied the neighbor had installed it. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if the fence was on the paved part and had a property survey been done. <br /> <br />Ms. Kari Willis, 8388 Groveland Road, stated she had a survey done in April 2006 so they would <br />assure the fence was put within their property boundaries. She stated a professional fence <br />installation company installed the fence according to zoning codes. <br /> <br />Ms. Willis stated the driveway blacktop had to be chipped out to set the footings which are entirely <br />within their property. She stressed they made sure the fence was well within the property line. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Ms. Willis if they had the property staked out along the property line. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked how far the stakes were located from the fence and where the <br />driveway was in relation to the stakes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.