Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 4, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Ms. Isakson replied this is a situation where the Fords are coming to the Planning Commission after <br />the fact in which the City played a great role. She stated there are so many practical considerations <br />that did make it a unique situation and the City bears some responsibility in this. She reported the <br />Fords put a lot of money and work into this and worked with the City all along. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stressed he wanted to be assured if this were granted, the City would not be liable. <br /> <br />Ms. Isakson replied the City would have some liability if it were not granted. She stated everyone <br />is trying to do what is best and given the situation, there are unique reasons to grant the variance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated there are many good points made on both sides. <br />He stated if the variance were denied, what would be put in the place of the blacktop removed. He <br />stated it would not look as nice and might cause problems for both parties. Director Ericson <br />expressed it is very clear there was some miscommunication and based on the Commission meeting <br />on September 20th, Staff was requested to draft a resolution of approval for up to the property line. <br />He stated if Ms. Willis and Mr. Severson said it encroaches onto their property, this is a civil <br />matter. He agreed if it were brought to the Planning Commission before the driveway was put in, it <br />would probably have been denied. He clarified the Planning Commission’s approval would be to <br />allow the driveway to remain at a zero-setback, and not a negative setback. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson encouraged the Fords not to pursue any issue with the placement of the posts, as <br />the Planning Commission would be quite liberally granting this variance if it were approved. He <br />also stated if the variance is granted, both neighbors should go home and consider themselves <br />fortunate. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn recommended the following statement be added to the variance: “by granting <br />this variance the City is hereby held harmless from any future litigation and it should not be <br />construed the City endorses a zero-setback.” <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Miller/Commissioner Zwirn, to approve Resolution 851-06 <br />approving a variance for a zero-foot driveway setback at 8378 Groveland Road; Planning Case <br />VR2006-008, with additional comments. <br /> <br />Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Abstain 2 (Stevenson and Meehlhause) Motion carried. <br /> <br />B. VR2006-009: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for storage of <br />flammable Liquids. Applicant: 7T’s Management, LLC (Tyson Companies), <br />4815 Mustang Circle. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller summarized a request for a conditional use permit for the storage of <br />flammable liquids at 4715 Mustang Circle. She stated this is actually an amendment to the <br />current conditional use permit the Tyson Company has allowing for a motor freight terminal on <br />the property. She stated Tyson is proposing to move Ferrellgas onto the property. She indicated <br />she brought a site plan for the Planning Commission’s reference. <br />