My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
12-06-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:20:45 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 10:20:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/6/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />C.G. Hill Variance Report <br />December 6, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />4. That granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br />that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. <br /> <br />Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in <br />that every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function <br />and viability of their business. Neither would such approval confer a special treatment <br />as similar reasonable variances have been granted in the past. <br /> <br />5. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br />Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. <br /> <br />Mr. Hill would like to have his business seen from the freeway and allowing for an <br />additional 91.5 square feet on the east elevation would be the minimum necessary to <br />provide suitable visibility. <br /> <br />6. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br /> <br />Granting a variance to allow the additional 100 square feet of building mounted signage <br />for a business with a large building and multiple visible elevations would not be <br />materially detrimental to the purpose and intent of the building code. There have been <br />no objections raised up to this point from any of the adjoining property owners. Given <br />the building’s size, the additional signage would not appear excessive. <br /> <br />7. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property <br />or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or <br />endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />The requested variance would not result in any of the above-cited adverse effects. <br /> <br /> <br />Deadline for Action: <br />This application was accepted on November 16, 2006 and in accordance with MN <br />Statutes §15.99, a decision shall be made within 60 days of application acceptance. The <br />deadline for action on this request is January 15, 2007. <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />Notices were sent to all property owners within 350 feet of 5150 Quincy Street. Staff <br />received a telephone call from Bethlehem Baptist Church on November 29, 2006, indicating <br />that they support allowing the additional signage for C.G. Hill. <br /> <br />All of the criteria, as indicated above, appear to be satisfied which would allow for the <br />granting of the variance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.