12-06-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission November 15, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 6 ________________________________________________________________________ the bylaws. He explained Staff, with other townhomes in the area, understands what works well. Director Ericson stated if the Planning Commission requires specifics over and above code requirements, they would need to be specified in the development agreement. He stated Staff would prepare this prior to City Council approval. Commissioner Hegland stated since the Planning Commission asked the developer to come up with the landscaping plan; he wants to ensure the association continues to maintain it. Commissioner Miller asked where the additional parking spots are located. Mr. Bourassa pointed out the two areas on the site map. He stated he read Planning Associate Heller’s report on park dedication and would like to revisit how the fee was determined. He indicated the fee was quite a bit higher than what he normally sees in the metro area. Chair Stevenson asked if anyone from the audience would like to comment. Mr. Duane Waldoch, 2935 County Highway 10, stated he agreed the development is set up nicely, however, his concern is snow removal and making sure fire trucks can access all areas. He stated he feels there should be two exits. He reported he thinks the City is shooting itself in the foot for letting this piece of property be designated for this project. He commented he is referring to the project on Long Lake Road and wonders if they are selling and questions just how many townhomes are needed in Mounds View. Mr. Waldoch stated he believes this area should be used for business and commercial development. Mr. Mark Schnor, 2949 County Highway 10, stated he talked to Mrs. Cindy Johnson who has plans to move out of Mounds View. He mentioned she called the developer but he would not buy her property. Mr. Schnor stated it looks like a nice development but the one way in and out would put more traffic on County Highway 10. He stressed the drainage issue goes to the west of his property. He stated last month there was a discussion as to whether this area should be declared a wetland; technically it is a holding pond. He mentioned this development would eliminate the only wooded area left in Mounds View and split up the property. He asked who would buy the Johnson property or his because of where this development is located. He stated he still feels this is a safety issue and asked if more multiple dwellings are needed in Mounds View. Mr. Ron Widmer, 2900 Sherwood Place, pointed out his property is at the northern section of this development. He mentioned his concerned is about the infiltration basin. He reported there are already water problems in his back yard. He stated he was told by the City that his property was on the water table when he built his home. He informed the Commission his neighbor had to replace his drain tiles because it was not pumping water out, as he is located on top of a water table. He stated he is concerned the drainage from the area would result in more water in back yards. Chair Stevenson asked if the engineers are aware of this.