Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council <br />~egular Meeting <br />Orduno reported that the original rate <br />packet as Scenario 1. The alternative <br />Scenario 2 which would raise the yearl; <br />$.91. This rate structure would raise <br />school property classifications. <br />Page Thirteen <br />September 13, 1993 <br />structure is included in the <br />rate structure is attached as <br />Y residential household cost by <br />the yearly costs for church and <br />Orduno asked Rocky Keene and Mike Ulrich, Public Works Supervisor, to <br />do a presentation on the projects listed in the surface water utility. <br />This will include impacts on certain areas of the City and on the City <br />as a whole. <br />Staff does not have a recommendation on this ordinance. The options <br />would be to adopt or not adopt the ordinance. The rate structure would <br />be formally set by resolution. The Council is at the adoption stage <br />and it would be a roll call vote. <br />.Rocky Keene, hydrologist from SEH, the cities consulting engineers, <br />gave a definition of the projects listed in the Local Water Management <br />Plan. Keene reported that the Council, during the past five years, as <br />a result of the Long Lake Road reconstruction, asked SEH to complete <br />two studies to see what impacts certain drainage areas would have on <br />the Long Lake Road project. One was the Ardan Avenue drainage district <br />and the other is the Edgewood drainage district. Mr. Keene listed <br />• those projects that were identified that would need to be constructed <br />in association with Long Lake Road and those that were impacted by the <br />Long Lake Road Project. <br />Mr. Keene stated that SEH worked. with City staff when the plan was <br />written to determine some projects that have to be done in addition <br />to the others throughout the City. Most of these projects are <br />maintenance projects such as storm sewer outlets, outlet <br />modifications, and sedimentation ponds, and controlling the City's <br />water quality. <br />Keene reported that the final area that was looked at in the Plan was <br />the feasibility studies. The purpose of these studies are related to <br />wetland issues. .All the wetland issues have had a feasibility study <br />connected to them. There are other projects including street sweeping, <br />general maintenance of the storm .sewer system and general cleaning <br />listed in the Plan. Ditch cleaning, catch basin repair and cleaning, <br />street sweeping is an important water quality aspect which could also <br />be funded by the Plan. Wetlands are another important issue and, <br />therefore, sedimentation removal should be a part of the Plan. <br />Mr. Keene gave a history of the City's storm sewer structure. Much of <br />this system was built in the 1950's. A major portion of the storm <br />sewer was constructed for sanitary sewer and not necessarily for storm <br />water drainage. The total construction of future projects identified in <br />the Plan will cost $1.2 million. The only projects to take place <br />within the next five years are the feasibility studies. <br />