My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-02-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03-02-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 5:46:59 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 5:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/2/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 2, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller noted that on page 1 at the very bottom it says, “parking ramps”. She <br />asked whether it should be “parking ramps” or “parking ramp”. <br /> <br />Mr. Dietrich agreed that it should be “parking ramp”, and that he would make that change. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller also noted that the box for “not applicable” was not checked on page 2, <br />Item 6, and she inquired as to whether it should be. <br /> <br />Mr. Dietrich confirmed that the box should be checked. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked when public input would be taken on this item. <br /> <br />Director Ericson replied that this evening’s meeting is a public hearing, and the public had been <br />invited. He noted that he did not receive any phone calls or letters. He informed the <br />Commission that he had a conversation with Sysco, and their only issue was that the <br />transportation system be adequate to handle additional traffic. Mr. Ericson pointed out that there <br />would be another City Council meeting following the Met Council’s approval where the public <br />would have an opportunity for input. <br /> <br />Mr. Dietrich mentioned that they anticipate that the Met Council will look at the transportation <br />issue, and that there has been a very thorough transportation study done. He added that other <br />issues of focus are storm water and storm water management. He stated that the Code is very <br />clear on what needs to be done. He added that there is a sanitary sewer interceptor that already <br />bisects a portion of the site, so they have looked at those capacities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked what “Hybrid I” meant on Table 3. <br /> <br />Mr. Dietrich explained that there is a plan in the works where Lake Drive, 35W,and County <br />Road J all come together, and that is one of the major elements of the study of the Stakeholders <br />meeting with MnDOT and the regional transportation engineers. He continued by saying that <br />Hybrid talks about possibly building a bridge so that Lake Drive could fly over 35W and then <br />come down for the southbound connection. <br /> <br />Director Ericson clarified that the “I” part of that is from I-35W. <br /> <br />Mr. Dietrich reassured the Commission that he would put that all on one line to eliminate the <br />confusion. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that Resolution 783-05 was before them if the Commission felt <br />comfortable with the amendment application. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked for clarification regarding the definition of Institutional as it applies <br />to this parcel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.