My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-02-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03-02-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 5:46:59 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 5:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/2/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 2, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />that those will expire in 2012, 2013, and 2014, after which time all of those properties within the <br />TIF Districts will come back onto the property tax rolls, and hopefully at that time they would <br />have addressed all of the City’s priorities in terms of redevelopment. He explained that they <br />would rather be involved in this redevelopment instead of letting nature take its course because <br />sometimes you end up with uses you rather not have. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson affirmed that this is exactly what TIF was set up to do. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller added that she didn’t have any problem with it. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson pointed out that this is right along the County Road 10 corridor, and right where <br />they want to develop, and he is very much for this. <br /> <br />Director Ericson reiterated that this is a situation where the property owners had approached the <br />City, and they had not been pursuing them. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause stated that he supported the City buying the property. He expressed <br />that his concern would be whether the present owners would not want to lease it back. He added <br />that he did not want to see an empty building standing there, and hopefully the City would decide <br />to take it down. <br /> <br />Director Ericson responded that the City does not want an empty building on the corridor either <br />and that removal of the building would be their recommendation. He added that if the present <br />owner does not wish to lease it back, they probably would not be interested in trying to lease it <br />out for another use. He added that it might be more conducive to level the site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn stated that he does not feel that the community should be involved in <br />purchasing real estate. He added however that this is a prime situation where the community <br />should be involved. He expressed that he does not support TIF, but he thought this may a good <br />use of the funds because the corridor needs to be redeveloped. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Miller. To Approve Resolution 782-05, Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of the Acquisition of the Donut Connection Parcel Located at 2394 <br />County Road 10. <br /> Ayes –4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: February 16, 2005 <br /> <br />Director Ericson mentioned that at the next Planning Commission meeting they would be <br />considering new applications for the Planning Commission vacancy and that they would need to <br />make a recommendation to the City Council. He added that the City Council would make the <br />appointment on February 28th. Director Ericson announced that the public is welcome to submit <br />an application for this vacancy. <br />______________________________________________________________________________
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.