Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 5A <br />Meeting Date: July 20, 2005 <br />Type of Business: Commission Action <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Jim Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing and Consideration of a Variance to Allow <br />(1) a Shed in a Front Yard and (2) Increased Fence <br />Height in the Front Yard of 5260 Jeffery Drive; Planning <br />Case VR2005-008 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The applicants, Richard and Alison Bagwill, are proposing to relocate an existing shed from <br />the rear yard of their property to what would technically be considered the front yard due to <br />multiple street frontages. In addition, the Bagwills are seeking approval to construct a six- <br />foot tall fence along the rear property line of the home, extending south toward O’Connell <br />Drive into what again would technically be considered the front setback. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Setback requirements are addressed in Section 1104.01 of the Zoning Code. Each zoning <br />district is listed with the corresponding front, side and rear setbacks. In an R-1, Single Family <br />Residential district, the typical building setbacks are as follows: Front, thirty (30) feet; Side, <br />ten (10) feet; and Rear, thirty (30) feet. It is noted that sheds and garages, attached or <br />detached, can have side and rear setbacks of five (5) feet. Corner lots, while not unique in <br />and of themselves, do pose some inherent limitations and difficulties by virtue of the multiple <br />street frontages. Corner lots may be further constrained depending upon building location <br />and the lot geometrics. <br /> <br />The property at 5260 Jeffrey Drive is a non-rectangular corner lot with more lot perimeter <br />fronting street than non-street frontage. In instances where this occurs, the result is more of <br />the property is technically considered front yard and less available for more private rear yard <br />enjoyment. The applicants currently have a shed in their rear yard as shown on the existing <br />site plan. As the Bagwills state in their letter, the shed was placed in the backyard by <br />previous owners in such a way that very little backyard was left over for the owners’ use. <br />Relocating the shed to the end of the existing driveway would allow the Bagwills to capture <br />more backyard space, of which there is already little due to the odd lot configuration and the <br />fact that the home is situated closer to the rear of the lot than the front. <br /> <br />In addition to the request to relocate the shed, the Bagwills seek a variance to construct a <br />six-foot tall fence which would extend beyond the front line of the home toward O’Connell <br />Drive and tie in with the relocated shed, as shown on the proposed site plan. According to <br />the City Code, fences which extend beyond the front line of the house may be no taller than <br />four feet. Were this property not a corner lot, neither the fence nor the shed would <br />necessitate variance approval. <br />