My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-03-2005
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-03-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 5:59:49 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 5:59:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/3/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SYSCO Report <br />Aug 3, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Comp Plan Amendment <br /> <br />A community’s Comprehensive Plan is its principal guiding document which is adopted to <br />provide goals and policies dealing with land usage, housing, infrastructure, public facilities, <br />transportation, economic development and intergovernmental coordination. The future land <br />use map (FLU Map) is but one of the many maps, tables and exhibits in the Comp Plan <br />which together help determine and control how a community grows and develops. The <br />Comp Plan is a fluid document, in other words it is not intended to be rigid and static. As the <br />Community grows and develops, so too should the Comp Plan. As such, there is an <br />amendment process to make such periodic updates as may be necessary to keep the Comp <br />Plan fresh and relevant based on changing desires and expectations. <br /> <br />SYSCO has applied for such a Comp Plan amendment which requests a redesignation of the <br />three-acre parcel proposed for transfer from the City to SYSCO from Passive Open Space <br />(OSP) to Heavy Industrial (HI.) The redesignation would seem appropriate as it would be <br />joined with the existing SYSCO parcel currently designated Heavy Industrial. The Planning <br />Commission needs to review potential adverse effects of proposed or requested <br />amendments. In this case, no adjoining property owner would be affected or impacted, as <br />the City owns the adjoining property. There would be impact to the site by virtue of proposed <br />wetland mitigation resulting from the relocated driveway and relocated stormwater <br />management pond. The Economic Development Authority (the EDA) at their meeting on July <br />11, 2005, recommended that if the amendments and land transfer occur, that mitigation be <br />done immediately adjacent to the affected area rather than creating new wetland off-site. <br /> <br />The consultant working for the applicant has prepared a Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />application package that will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council upon approval by the <br />City. Subsequent to the Planning Commission’s recommendation on the request, the <br />application (attached, labeled “Community Profile and Background”) will be forwarded to the <br />cities of Blaine and Shoreview, the counties of Ramsey and Anoka, Rice Creek Watershed <br />District (RCWD) and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). <br /> <br />Staff believes the proposed Comp Plan amendment is reasonable and supports a <br />recommendation of approval. <br /> <br /> <br />PUD Amendment <br /> <br />The amendment process for a Planned Unit Development is fairly straightforward. In this <br />case, the only amendment being considered is essentially an expansion of the site itself. No <br />changes in usage are being contemplated by this expansion. An amendment to the <br />development agreement would be prepared that would identify and assign any maintenance <br />issues associated with the relocated stormwater pond, potential access issues for the City to <br />the remainder of the SYSCO Outlot land, mitigation responsibilities and other issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.