My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-07-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
09-07-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 6:02:10 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 6:01:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/7/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Miller Wright Report <br />September 7, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The City’s Fire Marshal reviewed the site plans and has recommended drive aisle widths of <br />at least 24 feet on the east side of the building and at the northeast building corner. This <br />would result in a two-foot east and north (side and front) setback. Because the northeast <br />corner cannot be used as parking, the required setback would be the same as for the side of <br />the property—five feet. The area in which a variance would be needed is highlighted in <br />purple on the attached site plan. <br /> <br />Setback Requirements: <br /> <br />The parking lot and driveway setbacks for a property zoned B-3, Highway Business <br />Commercial, are as follows: <br /> <br />Driveways: Parking Lots <br />Front: 5 Feet Front: 30 Feet <br />Sides: 5 Feet Sides: 5 Feet * <br />Rear: 5 Feet Rear: 5 Feet <br /> <br />*The Code indicates that where a non-residential use abuts a residential use, the parking lot <br />setback shall be 20 feet. The west side of the parking area south of the PAK building abuts <br />residential and thus would be subject to the 20-foot requirement. The area immediately <br />adjacent to the west side of the building would be considered driveway and thus subject to <br />the five-foot setback. <br /> <br />Variance Considerations: <br /> <br />For a variance to be approved, there needs to be demonstrated hardship or practical <br />difficulties associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly <br />burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body <br />(the Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its <br />decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, <br />Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of <br />the criteria are met. The individual criteria with staff responses are as follows: <br /> <br />a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply <br />generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, <br />topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the <br />effective date hereof have had no control. <br /> <br />The lot at 2832 County Road 10 has very little change of elevation over the property <br />which causes practical difficulties dealing with stormwater runoff. The poor grade has <br />always been a condition of the site. In addition, if subject to the five-foot setback, the <br />width of the drive aisle on the northeast and east side of the building would not be <br />sufficient for emergency vehicle access. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.