10-19-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission October 5, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ Commissioner Hegland asked for confirmation that the comp plan is what the Commission is gauging projects on. He noted his prior question was if the TIF a plan was in compliance with the comp plan, because they did not have that information. Mr. Riggs replied that the TIF plan and the project it would support would be consistent with comp plan, reiterating that the Commission is not involved in any budgetary of the City. Commissioner Stevenson thanked Mr. Riggs for clarifying a few issues. Commissioner Miller stated the handouts are very helpful. Mr. Riggs replied that was the intent. He added he is open to questions in the future. ______________________________________________________________________________ 6. Planning Cases MA2005-002 and PD2005-002. Consideration of a Preliminary Plat Review, Rezoning and Development Stage Plan Review Associated with the Medtronic CRM Project. Commissioner Stevenson asked for clarification regarding the fact that one resolution was drafted for several items. He added that while each item is clearly broken down within the resolution, usually there are separate resolutions. Director Ericson replied that in the past different actions have been presented in separate resolutions; however, for this one it is not necessary because the Commission would be recommending approval or denial to Council as a whole. Commissioner Stevenson asked for a general consensus from the commission on the grouping of the actions into one Resolution and, upon receiving, stated the items will be acted on together. Community Development Director Ericson reviewed the staff report indicating the applicant, Medtronic, Inc., is requesting approval of the preliminary plat and development stage plans of the Medtronic PUD. The approved development, which has not changed, is a multi-phased project totaling 1,500,000 square feet in four connected, east-west oriented buildings. He reviewed the three different phases in terms of buildings, parking, and square footage. Director Ericson referenced the PUD noting only one wetland in the project area will be impacted. The judicial ditch will be realigned away from the building to alongside Highway 10 in a wider, more natural, meandering channel. Two new stormwater ponds will be created and an existing pond expanded to accommodate the run off on site. Director Ericson referenced the preliminary plat noting there are four lots, an outlot, and a possible sixth lot which would encompass the first phase parking ramp north of the phase 1 buildings. The City must consider a rezoning of the project area from the existing Light Industrial (l-1) designation to Planned Unit Development (PUD), which would be consistent with the comp plan. Director Ericson stated there are no compelling adverse effects associated with this project. He requested the Planning Commission review and consider the development stage plan, the CRM