My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-07-2004
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
01-07-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 6:14:46 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 6:14:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/7/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Temporary Structures Report <br />January 7, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />The other options which the Planning Commission could considered include the following: <br /> <br />2. Allow temporary structures only in conjunction with construction, renovation or repair <br />projects, and only for the period in which the permit remains valid. Structure would need to <br />be removed within 30 days after the project has been completed and signed-off by the <br />building official. No allowance would be made for temporary structures to cover vehicles and <br />other non-building related materials and possessions. <br /> <br />3. Take no action and respond to complaints on reactionary basis. This scenario would <br />maintain the status quo regarding temporary structures. They would continue to be prohibited <br />ands their presence would constitute a violation of the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />4. Allow temporary structures of any size, of any design and for any period of time, and <br />remove language from Code prohibiting membrane and canvas covered, tubular metal <br />framed structure. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Consider the four options presented. If Option 1 is preferred, a resolution is attached for your <br />action this evening recommending such an amendment to the City Council for their <br />consideration. If Option 2 is preferred, a new draft of the resolution containing the alternate <br />language could be acted on by the Commission with said recommendation forwarded on the <br />City Council. Option 2, however, would require substantial enforcement and policing by staff. <br /> If Option 3 is chosen, no further action would be necessary and the matter would be <br />dropped unless specifically requested to be brought forward by the City Council. The last <br />option would involve eliminating any and all restrictions on the siting and location of temporary <br />structures, which staff would not recommend. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Community Development Director <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. Photographic Documentation <br />2. Temporary metal framed structure plan <br />3. Resolution 749-04
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.