Laserfiche WebLink
personal political statements. If a commissioner were so compelled to make such <br />statements—which is his or her afforded right—they should be made where all other <br />residents would make such statements—at a City Council meeting. Being an appointed <br />board or commission member does not prohibit one from having an opinion contrary to the <br />City Council nor does it prohibit one from exercising the right to voice said opinion—far <br />from it; however being an appointed member of a board or commission does not afford that <br />person with the right to use that position in such a manner not otherwise intended. <br />I want to reiterate that free speech and personal opinions should be embraced and one <br />does not abdicate such rights upon appointment to a board or commission. Such <br />appointment however does come with the responsibility that the appointee follow and abide <br />by generally accepted and important guidelines for public comment. <br />Finally, I would like permission from a majority of the Planning Commission to draft <br />language that would be inserted into the Planning Commission Bylaws to memorialize the <br />generally held principles of public comment by a sitting commission member at a <br />commission meeting. The Bylaws would state that it would be inappropriate to make public <br />comments at a commission meeting unrelated to the assigned duties and responsibilities of <br />the Commission when a more fitting and suitable public venue is available, i.e., City <br />Council meetings. I would invite and encourage the Commission to discuss this matter to <br />ensure that the majority would support such an amendment. <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />