My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-01-2004
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-01-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 6:25:26 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 6:25:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission August 4, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the Council feels there are other issues that may justify going back to <br />a five-foot setback and, if there are situations where less than five feet is needed, then it should <br />go through the variance process. He then addressed previous concerns raised by the Commission <br />regarding driveways that would become nonconforming as a result of the amendment. He <br />summarized the City Code relating to nonconforming driveways in that permanent driveways <br />constructed prior to October 1999 could remain in place even if they were nonconforming, <br />however a nonconforming driveway permitted after October 1999 had no corresponding <br />protection. He further stated that the driveway requirements in the city code are confusing and <br />difficult to enforce and administer. Director Ericson suggested the Commission could review <br />these code sections and make a recommendation that would clarify the language at a subsequent <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that if the City had granted approval for a driveway less than five feet <br />from a property line and a true hardship exists then that would be justification for a variance. He <br />also indicated that there would be the option for an administrative variance provided the <br />neighbor does not object. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated there are driveways in town that are unimproved and he is <br />concerned that this may discourage those property owners from improve the driveway. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Section 90202 of the Code discusses nonconforming driveways <br />but separates out the permanent and nonpermanent and only provides that protection to <br />permanent driveways so, if the driveway is dirt or gravel, then it could not be rebuilt or expanded <br />regardless of what is adopted this evening. <br /> <br />Director Ericson suggested the City could create a program to assist property owners by <br />providing an incentive to improve the driveway such as by entering into a contract for discount <br />asphalt with one of the local asphalt companies. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that a majority of driveways with setbacks of less than five feet <br />probably have no apparent hardship which would require the reduced setback. He further <br />commented that he does not feel that this amendment would adversely affect more than a handful <br />of properties as most properties have sufficient room for a driveway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller indicated that this would eliminate the need to get permission from the <br />neighbor. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked Staff to read the reasons the Code is being changed. <br /> <br />Director Ericson read them. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Scotch. To Approve Resolution 768-04, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of a Code Amendment to the Zoning Code Regarding Driveway <br />Setbacks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.