Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 6 <br />Meeting Date: Dec 15, 2004 <br />Type of Business: Action <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Review City Code Language Pertaining to Driveways, <br />Driveway Setbacks and Curb Cuts, Consideration of <br />Resolution 780-04 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />On September 13, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance 752, an ordinance striking <br />language from the Code that--up to that point--had allowed for driveway setbacks up to up <br />one foot from a property line in single and two-family residential districts, as long as the <br />adjoining property owner indicated consent in writing. In addition to eliminating the one-foot <br />setback, the ordinance established a mechanism to allow for administrative variances for <br />driveways that had been previously granted a one-foot setback. The language adopted by <br />the Council was the same language recommended by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />During the review and consideration of Ordinance 752, it became apparent that the <br />regulations for driveways and curb cuts were confusing and difficult to administer due to the <br />various amendments that had been adopted over the years. The Planning Commission <br />suggested that upon completion of the setback issue, the regulations of driveways and curb <br />cuts in general be addressed. <br /> <br />On November 17, 2004, the Planning Commission discussed the remainder of the driveway <br />and curb cut requirements and determined that further amendments would be appropriate to <br />eliminate confusion and to become more consistent with other sections of the Municipal <br />Code. The primary issue for consideration would be to eliminate the “protected status” of <br />non-conforming driveways and curb cuts. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The primary regulation of driveways occurs in Section 1104.01, subdivision 4b, with the <br />language extending protection to nonconforming driveways and curb cuts as follows: <br /> <br />(2) Driveways in existence as of the date of enactment of ordinance 620 and which do <br />not conform to the provisions of this subsection, may continue subject to the <br />provisions of Section 902.02, subdivision 2. (Ord. 620, 7-27-98; Ord. 642, 1-10-00) <br /> <br />Subpart 2 above indicates simply that nonconforming permanent driveways installed prior to <br />1998 may remain in place, may be altered, expanded or replaced so long as the driveway or <br />curb cut does not pose a significant public safety hazard. Staff’s position is, if the driveway <br />or curb cut can be made conforming in association with a street improvement project or <br />driveway replacement, why preclude that as a possibility?