Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 5 <br />Meeting Date: March 19, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Discussion <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: James Ericson, Interim City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Changes to the Zoning Code Related to <br />Pawnshops <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />As the Commission is aware, the City is in the process of amending it’s zoning and Business <br />Code to allow for the regulation of Pawnshops in Mounds View. The City Council adopted <br />an Interim ordinance on February 27, 2003 which directs the Planning Commission to review <br />the zoning implications and to recommend applicable provisions. At he Commission’s last <br />meeting on March 5, 2003, I indicated that a Planning Consultant was retained to assist with <br />the development of the amendments. Attached is a first draft of the proposed zoning <br />amendments. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The proposed amendments, attached as Exhibit 1, add definitions to the Zoning Code and <br />identify which district such a use would be appropriate. Also contemplated by the draft <br />language is whether the use would be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use. <br /> As you can see from the attached language, the district identified for such a use is the B4, <br />Regional Business District. The use is, at least thus far, is proposed as an permitted use. My <br />initial reasoning why a Pawnshop could be considered a permitted use rather than <br />conditionally permitted use is based on the requirements that will be addressed in Chapter <br />500 of the Municipal Code, which will address all of the specific licensing requirements. <br />(That component of the ordinance is not yet ready for review.) The City Council would need <br />to hold a public hearing regarding a requested Pawnshop license, a background investigation <br />would be performed and staff would review any licensing requirements and conditions and <br />provide such research to the City Council. It would seem redundant to require a public <br />hearing for the license and then another public hearing for the use itself. <br /> <br />Issues that will be addressed under the licensing provisions would include an annual license <br />fee, a per-transaction fee, investigation fee, and all other operational requirements that <br />reside outside the realm of zoning. <br /> <br />Staff will be proposing the following fees relative to Pawnshops: <br /> <br />o $2,500 annual fee <br />o $500 investigation fee <br />o $1.50 per transaction fee <br />o $5,000 performance bond in force for the life of the operation <br />