My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
03-19-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 7:26:40 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 6:37:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/19/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 19, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland commented that the change would allow all B-2 business functions on <br />that property and would change the zoning to “R-B2.” <br /> <br />Director Ericson agreed but said that the Code discusses low intensity businesses but does not <br />define what those businesses are. He then suggested removing the reference to B-2. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland expressed concern with allowing B-2 type businesses on the property <br />because of the residential properties that abut it. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated eliminating the B-2 component would not change anything as long as <br />there is an allowance for the use that is currently there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if the expansion is to facilitate the same type of business being <br />operated. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson said yes and indicated it would take trailers into the shop rather than the yard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if the property is for sale. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson indicated the property is for sale but said this would not prevent a major <br />development from coming in. He then said there is contact from time to time with potential <br />developers and there is a developer asking around right now but he cannot wait to expand his <br />business to see if it sells. He further indicated that he asked those around him what they would <br />rather see on the site and they all said they would prefer commercial development to residential <br />condominium development. He also indicated he had told his neighbors he was intending to <br />expand his garage and none of them had an issue with it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if there had been any further contact with the developer that was <br />before the City a few months ago. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson indicated that the developer has been contacting the fifth house on Groveland Road <br />and made a low ball bid and she cannot replace the house for that. The resident zoned R-3 is not <br />interested in selling because the condominiums would face his sideyard. He then said he had <br />recommended the developer put the property back up for sale as the condominium plan is not <br />going to work. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson indicated it could be a number of years before the area redevelops and he needs to <br />expand his garage now. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked if additional parking would be needed. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson indicated he has sufficient parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland said he felt the situation is unique enough that it would not set a <br />precedence if the variance was requested.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.