Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No : 6 <br />Meeting Date : April 2, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Commission Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Chair Stevenson and Planning Commissioners <br />From: James Ericson, Interim City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Further Discussion and Reconsideration of the “No Parking” Request <br />on Greenfield Avenue South of County Road I <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />On March 24, 2003, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the request to post the east side <br />of Greenfield Avenue 350 feet south of County Road I “No Parking” Monday through Saturday, 8 am to 6 <br />pm. Commissioners Johnson and Zwirn attended the meeting as did property owner Steve Farrell and a <br />tenant at the property, Ted Rose. Mr. Rose operates the State Farm Insurance Agency in the building. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />After taking testimony, the Council acknowledged that a parking problem existed in the area and was <br />concerned that Mr. Farrell’s clients and employees were parking on the street causing an inconvenience <br />for the property owners south on Greenfield Avenue. The Council discussed with staff and the property <br />owner various alternatives that could be employed to resolve the situation without imposing parking <br />restrictions. <br /> <br />The Council asked Mr. Farrell if he would be willing to expand his parking lot, to which Mr. Farrell <br />responded in the affirmative; and the Council also discussed the possibility of allowing parking on <br />Greenfield directly across from the building, but not any further south until beyond the 350-foot location. <br />Allowing parking on Greenfield across from the business would leave two or three stalls and if the <br />parking lot were expanded by two stalls, that could potentially resolve the parking situation. While that <br />may be true, the Council was told the Commission had already discussed the parking lot expansion <br />issue at length and was concerned that any further expansion of the lot would be an aesthetic detriment <br />to the neighborhood. The Council also suggested exploring the possibility of striping for narrower <br />parking stalls (i.e., 8 ½ feet in width instead of the required 9 feet) and whether that would generate more <br />stalls. <br /> <br />After considering all of the testimony and information presented, the City Council tabled action on the <br />request, sending the issue back to the Planning Commission for additional review and consideration. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Reconsider the parking situation and dimensional requirements and determine if there is a need to <br />amend the Commission’s Resolution 718-03 recommending No Parking on Greenfield Ave. <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson