Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 06 <br />Meeting Date: April 16, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Commission Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Proposed PUD Amendment Regarding the <br />Property Located at 2442 County Highway 10 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />On May 11, 1998, the Mounds View City Council approved Resolution 5226, a resolution <br />formally approving a Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement for a theater development <br />on a parcel bounded by County Road H2 to the south, Long Lake Road to the west and <br />Highway 10 (now County Highway 10) to the north. The PUD agreement established uses <br />for the site which were as follows: <br /> <br />• Multi-screen movie theater <br />• Office uses <br />• Parking <br />• Restaurants <br />• Retail <br /> <br />The PUD agreement was specific as to which uses would be located on which lots. Since its <br />approval, four of the seven parcels have been developed: The theater, the parking lot (which <br />is its own lot since it is separated form the theater by Edgewood Drive right of way) and an <br />office building. Recently, Jake’s of Mounds View entered into a purchase agreement with <br />the developer to improve the second of the three office lots for additional parking to serve <br />Jake’s. (The remaining office parcel is also being considered for additional parking by <br />Carmike Cinemas.) The only two remaining undeveloped lots then are identified by the <br />developer as Outparcel “A” and Outparcel “B”. Outparcel B is the undeveloped lot next to <br />the theater which was planned for use as a restaurant or retail, or a combination of the both. <br /> <br />Outparcel A, the parcel within the PUD currently being considered for amendment, was <br />originally established for a restaurant use. Since the theater opened, the developer’s <br />representatives have marketed the site to potential restaurateurs and franchise groups, <br />however they have not succeeded in securing an appropriate restaurant tenant, which has <br />prompted them to consider alternative uses and, this PUD amendment. In addition to the <br />restaurant use, the developer would like to add “office” as a permitted use for the parcel. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />An amendment to a Planned Unit Developments is processed as would an amendment to an <br />approved Conditional Use Permit, which is to say that the procedural requirements of <br />Section 1125 of the Zoning Code would be followed. Section 1125 requires that the <br />Planning Commission review the request, taking into consideration any and all potential <br />adverse effects of the proposed amendment. <br /> <br /> <br />