Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 6 <br />Meeting Date: May 21, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Development Review Request for <br />Properties Located at 2436 and 2442 County Highway <br />10, Planning Cases DE03-001 and DE03-002 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The applicant, LandCor Development of Maple Grove, has requested a development review <br />on two separate parcels within the Anthony Properties / Theater Planned Unit Development <br />to construct a two-story office building at the corner of Long Lake Road and County Highway <br />10, and a multi-tenant food / retail building next to the theater at the corner of Edgewood <br />Drive and County Highway 10. The purpose of a development review is to allow the <br />Planning Commission to evaluate proposed development in terms of its consistency with City <br />Codes and other requirements and to ascertain and mitigate any potential impacts to the <br />adjoining properties and the community as a whole. The Planning Commission makes a <br />recommendation to the City Council, which then acts upon the request. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the site plans and suggested some revisions. Staff has <br />received the revised plans and has reviewed them based on the suggestions made by staff <br />and the Planning Commission. On a related note, the City Council on May 12, 2003 <br />approved the PUD amendment which now permits an office building on Outparcel A. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br /> Outparcel A Outparcel B <br />Building and Parking Lot Setbacks OK OK <br />Parking Stalls OK OK <br />Handicap Accessible Stalls OK OK <br />Drive Aisle, Curb Cuts OK OK <br />Photometric Analysis (1) OK OK <br />Landscaping (2) OK OK <br />Circulation OK OK <br />Building Height (3) OK OK <br />Utilities OK OK <br />PUD Consistency OK OK <br /> (1) The height of the light standards (poles) are not indicated. The plans should be revised <br />accordingly. <br />(2) Landscape plans have been clarified however additional copies are needed for the City <br />Forester to review. City Approval subject to Forester approval. <br />(3) Although compliant, the building elevations are not stated and should be.