Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />parking on. He further commented that the plans would be amended and they would meet all <br />City requirements should the project proceed. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if the extra spaces could be added. <br /> <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated that they had tried to respect the setbacks but could add six more spaces on <br />site with some consideration from the City. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson commented that the Commission is keenly aware of how parking issues can <br />affect the surrounding area and will ensure that the development has adequate parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked how many uses were expected for the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated he expected four or five and no more than six. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the tenants would be medical and dental. <br /> <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated he thought so but lost a big user that he was planning on. He then said that <br />he has been talking to other medical practitioners but they are not as heavy as a use as what was <br />initially proposed. <br /> <br />The Commission asked whether a coffee shop was possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated he was working very hard on a coffee shop but said he did not want to <br />disrupt their relationships with their landlords by naming names. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />7. Consideration of Resolution 724-03, a Resolution Recommending Approval of Two <br />Ordinances Related to Pawnshops, Zoning and Licensing in Mounds View <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson overviewed the history of the pawnshop ordinances <br />for the Commission. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he had not added the manager definition but will do so. He then <br />asked for clarification on the buy hold and the pawn hold and reviewed the other changes that <br />were made based on the discussions at the last meeting. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Mr. Sonterre had raised a number of issues at the last meeting and <br />overviewed them with the Commission. He then said that the way the Code is drafted <br />concerning violations and revocation allows the City flexibility to review the violation and make <br />a determination as to whether it warrants revocation. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff had reviewed the fees of other cities and found Mounds <br />View’s fees to be in the middle. He then said that if it is determined that the recommended fee is <br />inadequate the fee would be changed immediately.