My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-04-2003
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
06-04-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 7:27:21 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 7:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/4/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Consideration of Development Review Requests Regarding Properties Located at <br />2436 and 2442 Highway 10 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained where the parcels were located and <br />provided an overview of the development. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the applicant would need 60 parking stalls or would need to <br />shrink the size of the building to conform to the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to provide photometric analysis for the <br />adjacent residential properties to conform to the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to provide further specifications with regard <br />to the garbage enclosure. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the landscaping plans provided look nice but the City Forester will <br />review it and make recommendations for specific plantings. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that no sign plan had been submitted yet but the PUD will dictate <br />what type of sign is allowed. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that it looks as though the site plan submitted was carried over from a <br />previous site plan so there are some notes to be revised on it. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that all dimensional requirements and setbacks are met for Outparcel <br />B. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff is recommending that the developer revise the plans and <br />correct them as noted but feels no reason not to approve the development review at the next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if Staff addressed the distance from the pond as it seems there would <br />be additional parking available. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the problem is that the pond is already there and, if it is adequate to <br />suit the needs of the site it may not be possible to change it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked how long Rice Creek would take to review this development. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated it usually takes from 30 to 45 days for Rice Creek Watershed <br />approval. <br /> <br />Audie Tarpley addressed the Commission and apologized for the shortcomings in the drawings <br />and explained that limited engineering work was done in case the project is turned down. He <br />then said that the building is 12,500 square feet of useable space and that is what they based the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.