Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Consideration of Development Review Requests Regarding Properties Located at <br />2436 and 2442 Highway 10 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained where the parcels were located and <br />provided an overview of the development. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the applicant would need 60 parking stalls or would need to <br />shrink the size of the building to conform to the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to provide photometric analysis for the <br />adjacent residential properties to conform to the Code. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to provide further specifications with regard <br />to the garbage enclosure. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the landscaping plans provided look nice but the City Forester will <br />review it and make recommendations for specific plantings. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that no sign plan had been submitted yet but the PUD will dictate <br />what type of sign is allowed. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that it looks as though the site plan submitted was carried over from a <br />previous site plan so there are some notes to be revised on it. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that all dimensional requirements and setbacks are met for Outparcel <br />B. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff is recommending that the developer revise the plans and <br />correct them as noted but feels no reason not to approve the development review at the next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if Staff addressed the distance from the pond as it seems there would <br />be additional parking available. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the problem is that the pond is already there and, if it is adequate to <br />suit the needs of the site it may not be possible to change it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked how long Rice Creek would take to review this development. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated it usually takes from 30 to 45 days for Rice Creek Watershed <br />approval. <br /> <br />Audie Tarpley addressed the Commission and apologized for the shortcomings in the drawings <br />and explained that limited engineering work was done in case the project is turned down. He <br />then said that the building is 12,500 square feet of useable space and that is what they based the