My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-04-2003
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
06-04-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 7:27:21 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 7:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/4/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that Minnesota Statutes sets the maximum interest rate but the City of <br />Mounds View could set something less if the City feels 24% is excessive. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated that the Commission needed to discuss the possibility of creating an <br />overlay district and where that would be located. He then said the current version of the <br />Ordinance allows pawnshops in the B-4 zoning district. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he would like the definition of manager to include that the manager is <br />on site an average total of 80 hours per month. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he would like fee recommendations to be included when the <br />recommendation goes to Council. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated he would add it after the first now therefore be it resolved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated he would like to hear from Chief Sommer as to whether he <br />feels the fees are adequate. <br /> <br />Chief Sommer addressed the Commission and provided an overview of how the police <br />department would use the APS system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked whether the system was used only for investigating or <br />periodically. <br /> <br />Chief Sommer indicated the use would depend upon how much time the department can devote <br />to the investigation of pawnshops. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland commented that the APS system is a deterrent for thieves attempting to <br />unload stolen goods because, if the system is used properly, they will get caught. <br /> <br />Chief Sommer indicated that is a side benefit but there are many items of stolen property that end <br />up in pawnshops with the automated pawn system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked for the percentage of stolen goods pawned. <br /> <br />Chief Sommer indicated that some items cannot be easily tracked such as CD’s and things <br />without serial numbers. He then said that he has no information to be able to answer what the <br />percentage of stolen goods would be. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn asked whether it was the consensus of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, and <br />Mounds View Police Departments that the automated system becomes another avenue for <br />legalized fencing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.