My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
08-20-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2018 7:16:57 AM
Creation date
9/4/2018 7:16:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/20/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Kopas Variance Report <br />August 20, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />4. That granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br />that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. <br /> <br />Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in <br />that every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function <br />and viability of their business. Neither would such approval confer a special treatment <br />as similar reasonable variances have been granted in the past. <br /> <br /> <br />5. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br />Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. <br /> <br />Mr. Kopas has existing signage at his New Brighton location which he would like to have <br />installed on the north elevation. The area of this signage is 50 square feet. The area of <br />the “Sunrooms” sign on the south elevation is less than 50 square feet. Allowing for an <br />additional 50 feet at both building ends would be the minimum necessary to provide <br />suitable visibility. <br /> <br /> <br />6. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br /> <br />Granting a variance to allow the additional 100 square feet of building mounted signage <br />for the corner businesses would not be materially detrimental to the purpose and intent <br />of the building code. There have been no objections raised up to this point from any of <br />the adjoining property owners. Given the building’s size, the additional signage would <br />not appear excessive. <br /> <br /> <br />7. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property <br />or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or <br />endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />The requested variance would not result in any of the above-cited adverse effects. <br /> <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />All of the criteria, as indicated above, appear to be satisfied which would allow for the <br />granting of the variance. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.