Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page 10 <br />Regular Meeting April 24, 1995 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to Approve Contracting with <br />Tautges, Redpath and Co., Ltd. to Conduct a Single Audit at a <br />Cost Not to Exceed $2,500 with Funds to be Transferred from <br />Contingency Account <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />G. Consideration of Resolution No. 4746 Approving the Union <br />Contract and the 1995 Compensation Schedule and Insurance <br />Contribution Schedule for Police Union <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reported that this labor <br />agreement had been put together per the arbitration award and <br />she summarized the 1994 and 1995 increases. Ms. Orduno <br />explained that, since this was an arbitration award, the <br />Council is bound by State Law to approve. <br />MOTION~SECOND: Hankner/Trude to Adopt Resolution No. 4746 <br />Approving the Union Contract and the 1995 Compensation <br />Schedule and Insurance Contribution Schedule for Police Union <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />• H. Consideration of Resolution No. 4753 Approving the Baraaininq <br />Unit Contract and the 1995 Compensation Schedule and Insurance <br />Contribution Schedule for the Public Works and Parks <br />Maintenance Bargaining Unit <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the provisions of <br />the labor agreement and noted the changes from the previous <br />agreement. <br />MOTION1 SECOND: Trude/Hankner to Adopt Resolution No. 4753 <br />Approving the Bargaining Unit Contract and the 1995 <br />Compensation Schedule and Insurance Contribution Schedule for <br />the Public Works and Parks Maintenance Bargaining Unit <br />Tim Cruikshank, Assistant to the City Administrator, presented <br />information to the City Council which was a requirement of a <br />State Law passed by the Minnesota Legislature in 1993. The <br />law requires public employers to furnish the information to <br />the public as well as the City Council upon ratifying a <br />collective bargaining agreement. The intent of the law is to <br />provide a standard basis to compare total compensation <br />settlements from year to year. <br />Ms. Orduno stressed that this requirement was a costly, time <br />consuming and irrelevant document. It is the epitome of an <br />unfunded mandate. <br />