Laserfiche WebLink
CJ <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />Page 8 <br />April 24, 1995 <br />MOTIONjSECOND: Hankner/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4756 <br />Approving a Development Review/Planned Unit Development <br />Amendment for Dynex Industries, 4751 Mustang Circle, <br />Contingent Upon Approval of Rice Creek Watershed District <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />• <br />Mayor Linke expressed his appreciation to Dynex Industries for <br />everything they have done for the community. <br />C. Consideration of Resolution No. 4757 Reaarding Zero Lot Line <br />Subdivision Request of Larrv Beach, 7540 Silver Lake Road <br />D. Consideration of Resolution No. 4758 Regarding Zero Lot Line <br />Subdivision Request of Larry Beach, 7550 Silver Lake Road <br />Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator, explained <br />that he would be combining Items C. and D. as they go <br />together. Larry Beach had made application for zero lot line <br />subdivisions for the properties located at both 7540 and 7550 <br />Silver Lake Road. The zero lot line subdivision request is to <br />allow Mr. Beach to owner-occupy sell some twin homes that are <br />currently being built on the property. The twin homes are an <br />allowed use, so he was able to proceed with the construction. <br />The request meets the intent of Municipal Code. The lots are <br />short by one one-hundredth of a foot, which amounts to less <br />than an eighth of an inch. Mounds View Planning Commissioners <br />reviewed the situation and felt that they were comfortable <br />with recommending approval of the zero lot line subdivision. <br />M_OTIONjSECOND: Trude/Hankner to Adopt Resolution No. 4757 and <br />Resolution No. 4758 Approving a Zero Lot Line Minor <br />Subdivision, Larry Beach, 7540 and 7550 Silver Lake Road <br />VOTE:. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Larry Beach, 6951 Knollwood Drive, said that when he made <br />application for the twin home permits, he was charged a set <br />amount per side because each unit has a different address. He <br />plans to build eight more identical units using the same <br />plans, and was informed that he would be charged that amount <br />for each unit. <br />Mayor Linke felt that the matter warranted review since the <br />plans to be used are identical. <br />Mr. Harrington suggested that the policy for permits for <br />identical structures be discussed at the May 1, 1995 Work <br />Session. <br />