Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting -August 28, 1995 <br />6 <br />the meters now so that the city will have a system that is reliable and one that will last for <br />the next 20 to 30 years. <br />Ms. Trade stated she has been talking with some people in other cities about this issue. <br />When she talked with staff from New Brighton, who replaced their system one or two <br />years ago with atouch-read system, they said the revenue does not increase noticeably <br />due to accuracy of the water meters. The real savings are in the staff time internally. The <br />biggest problem she feels is that the city is tying up a lot of public works staff in trying to <br />work with uncooperative residents or those who are busy. <br />Ms. Trade explained that Option #2 is 40% less costly and it can pay for itself without <br />residents having a surcharge added to their quarterly water bill. In her mind, this system is <br />the only one she can justify. <br />Mr. Ulrich noted that at the August 21, 1995 Informational Meeting, one of the concerned <br />residents asked if NSP would be interested in reading the city's water meters for a fee. <br />This resident put in a lot of work and talked with several people. This was also done by <br />Mr. Ulrich several months ago, however he was not able to get them to return his calls. <br />• Mr. Ulrich stated he talked with Annie Hoffman who is in charge of the metro meter <br />division of NSP who stated anything is possible in working with NSP. They are currently <br />working on a project with the City of Cottage Grove, and depending upon the type of <br />system they install, NSP may read the meters or have the city read the NSP meters. Mr. <br />Ulrich stated he would like to thank the resident for his work. It is possible that if the <br />phone read system were installed, the city could read NSP's gas and water meters. <br />Mayor Linke briefly explained the two Options that were before the City Council for <br />consideration. He noted that Option #1 includes a $3.00/quarter surcharge to residents. <br />Approximately $2.68 of this would go to help pay back the loan and $.32 would go into a <br />fund for future work on the system. Additional costs include options of going with a radio <br />read system rather than a phone read which would cost $25.00 plus staff is proposing <br />adding a quarterly charge (approximately $15.00) to read the meter. If a resident will not <br />allow the change over to be made, they will be charged an additional $50.00 per quarter. <br />MOTION/SECOND: HanknerBlanchard to recommend that the Council accept Option <br />#1 and award the RFP from WaterPro to conduct the install the proposed water meter <br />change out, authorize a loan from the Special Projects fund in the amount of $500,000, <br />the utilization of $330,000 from the WAC fund to pay for the capital expense of the <br />equipment, and transferring both amounts to account #700-3961 Transfers from other <br />funds, amend the Water Fund Budget account #700-396' Transfers from other funds by <br />• adding $830,000, and add $830,000 to account #700-4123-703 Water Infrastructure <br />