My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Docs re Amendments Ch 4, 6, 8 and 12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Correspondence
>
Docs re Amendments Ch 4, 6, 8 and 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 5:13:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
1/1/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and places of holding cuch the election. Failure to give skiekk the notice required by <br /> this section shall does not invalidate suekk the election.15 <br /> 12This provision for advisory elections, is probably <br /> unique in Minnesota (thestatutorycity code permits it <br /> only on the question of joining a special district with <br /> taxing powers, but that authority has rarely, if ever, <br /> been used) . The draft deletes this language, and the <br /> commission should consider carefully reinserting it for <br /> the following reasons: <br /> (i) what questions may be the subject of advisory <br /> elections? As written, anything may be <br /> submitted; <br /> (ii) an irresponsible City Council could simply turn <br /> every tough decision over to the voters; <br /> (iii) if the election is advisory only the council need <br /> not follow the results, making a lot of voters <br /> unhappy to say the least; <br /> (iv) under Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.16, 20% of <br /> the voters can force a special election and <br /> having the ability to force an advisory election <br /> ona controversial subject could be a source of <br /> mischief on the part of either proponents or <br /> opponents; <br /> (v) a well-conducted survey will probably provide <br /> better results at a lower cost. <br /> 13This formulation makes it clear that only one notice, <br /> fifteen days prior, need be given. <br /> 14No time limit is stated. Should it be two weeks, one <br /> week, ten days? See Note 15. <br /> 151Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.16, has detailed <br /> notice provisions more useful than those stated here. <br /> The city probably follows the statute. A simple <br /> reference to state law would probably be better here. <br /> VII. Council Action on Budget - <br /> Section 7.06. Council Action on Budget. Subdivision 1. The budget <br /> and at subccepacEtt meetilags u#41 a beset is adopted for the encuing year.16 The <br /> council must, by a budget resolution, adopt the budget at the time required by law. <br /> The budget is the principal item of business at regular council meetings at the time <br /> required by law and at subsequent meetings until the budget is adopted) Tho <br /> mectingc &hall be-oe cendueted t be conducted in a manner to give interested <br /> 11.71C43658 4 <br /> MU125-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.