My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Docs re Amendments Ch 4, 6, 8 and 12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Correspondence
>
Docs re Amendments Ch 4, 6, 8 and 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 5:13:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
1/1/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10/30/92 10:28 HOLMES a GRAVEN NO.002 007 <br /> and places of holding eiteh the election. Failure to give eueh the notice required by <br /> this section shall does not invalidate seek the election.ls <br /> 12This provision for advisory elections is probably <br /> unique in Minnesota (the statutory city code permits it <br /> only on the question of joining a special district with <br /> taxing powers, but that authority has rarely, if ever, <br /> been used). The draft deletes this language, and the <br /> commission should consider carefully reinserting it for <br /> the following reasons: <br /> (i) what questions may be the subject of advisory <br /> elections? As written, anything may be <br /> submitted; <br /> (ii) an irresponsible City Council could simply turn <br /> every tough decision over to the voters; <br /> (iii) if the election is advisory only the council need <br /> not follow the results, making a lot of voters <br /> unhappy to say the least; <br /> (iv) under Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.16, 20% of <br /> the voters can force a special election and <br /> having the ability to force an advisory election <br /> on a controversial subject could be a source of <br /> mischief on the part of either proponents or <br /> opponents; <br /> (v) a well-conducted survey will probably provide <br /> better results at a lower cost. <br /> 13Thia formulation makes it clear that only one notice, <br /> fifteen days prior, need be given. <br /> 14Ne time limit is stated. Should it be two weeks, one <br /> week, ten days? See Note 15. <br /> "Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.16, has detailed <br /> notice provisions more useful than those stated here. <br /> The city probably follows the statute. A simple <br /> reference to state law would probably be better here. <br /> VII. Council Action on Budget <br /> Section 7.06. Council Action on Budget. Subdivision 1. T-100-40a4get <br /> • - - - - _ _ - _ _ = __ . 16 The <br /> council must b a bud- =t resolution ado.t the bud: =t at the time re•uired b law. <br /> The budget is the principal item of business at regular council meetings at the time <br /> required bvw and at subsequent meetings until the budget is adopted. The <br /> to give interested <br /> D3143636 4 <br /> 141123-.16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.