Laserfiche WebLink
HOLMES & GRAVEN <br /> CHARTERED <br /> Attorneys at Law <br /> 470 Pillsbury Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402 <br /> ROBERT A.ALSOP (612)337-9300 ROBERT C.LONG <br /> RONALD H.BATTY LAURA K.MOLLET <br /> STEPHEN J.BUBUL Facsimile(612)337-9310 BARBARA L.PORTWOOD <br /> JOHN B.DEAN JAMES M.STROMMEN <br /> MARY G.DOBBINS JAMES J.THOMSON,JR. <br /> STEFANIE N.GALEY LARRY M.WERTHEIM <br /> CORRINE A.HEINE BONNIE L.WILKINS <br /> JAMES S.HOLMES WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL GARY P.WINTER <br /> DAVID J.KENNEDY <br /> JOHN R.LARSON 337-9209 DAVID L.GRAVEN(1929.1991) <br /> WELLINGTON H.LAW VIA RAPIFAX AND MAIL OF COUNSEL <br /> CHARLES L.LEFEVERE ROBERT C.CARI.SON <br /> JOHN M.LEFEVRE,JR. ROBERT L.DAVIDSON <br /> ROBERT J.LINDALL T.JAY SALMEN <br /> November 10, 1994 <br /> Samantha Orduno <br /> Clerk-Administrator <br /> City of Mounds View <br /> 2401 Highway 10 <br /> Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 <br /> RE: Term Limits Charter Amendment <br /> Dear Samantha: <br /> You inquired as to what the process would be if the city council wanted to challenge <br /> the constitutionality of the term limit charter amendment that was on the November <br /> 8, 1994 ballot. The city council would have essentially two options if it desires to <br /> challenge the constitutionality of the charter amendment provision. <br /> The first option would be to commence a declaratory judgment action in state court. <br /> The action would need to name as a defendant a person or entity that has a stake in <br /> upholding the ballot proposition. Because there is a case currently pending before <br /> the Minnesota Supreme Court (see discussion below), I doubt that a trial court would <br /> decide the city's case until the Minnesota Supreme Court issues its ruling. <br /> T-he-second option--would involve-not filing-a-cop-y-ofthe-c-har-te-r-amendment with--the <br /> Secretary of State or County Recorder. Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.112, subd. <br /> 4, states that the procedure for filing amendments to the charter is the same as the <br /> procedure followed when the original charter was adopted. Minnesota Statutes, <br /> Section 410.11, sets forth that process. That section provides: "The city clerk <br /> shall file with the secretary of state, the county recorder of the county in which the <br /> city lies, and in the city clerk's office a copy of the charter accompanied by a <br /> certificate attesting to the accuracy of the copy and giving the date of the election <br /> and the vote by which the charter was adopted." <br /> I have checked with the Minneapolis city attorney's office and they inform me that <br /> their case on the constitutionality of term limits is currently pending before the <br /> Minnesota Supreme Court. The question that the Minnesota Supreme Court will <br /> address is whether term limits violate Article 7, Section 6 of the Minnesota <br /> Constitution. (That provision establishes the qualifications to hold elective office.) <br /> The briefing of that issue by the parties is expected to be completed in early <br /> JJT79159 <br /> MU125-1.1 <br />