My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Various Documents 1994
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
Correspondence
>
Various Documents 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 7:04:05 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 7:04:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
1/1/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Charter Commission <br /> June 28 , 1994 <br /> Page Two <br /> qualifications for local government office. The language of <br /> Article XII, Section 3 on its face seems clear. The Amendment <br /> gives the State Legislature the right to provide qualifications <br /> for local office. While this Constitutional Amendment may give <br /> the Legislature the authority to grant to individual <br /> municipalities the right to set qualifications for local office, <br /> there is no statute, in my opinion, which could be interpreted as <br /> attempting to convey such authority. <br /> There is a recent case in which the Appellate Court reviewed the <br /> Legislature's authority to place limitations on eligibility for <br /> county sheriffs positions. In Elbers v. Grow, 502 N.W. 2d 310 <br /> (Minn. App. 1993) the Appellate Court was asked to rule on the <br /> ability of the State Legislature to place limitations on -- <br /> individuals for two separate county sheriffs positions. The <br /> Court held that the "plain language" of Minnesota's Constitution, <br /> Article XII, Section 3 , clearly authorizes the Legislature to <br /> change qualifications for local office. While the Elbers Court <br /> did not address the issue of local regulations of local offices, <br /> it very clearly concluded that the State Legislature under <br /> Article XII , Section 3 , was the body authorized to place <br /> qualifications on local offices. <br /> In the State Legislature last year there was a proposed Bill <br /> which called for term limits. The Bill which would have sent the <br /> issue of term limits to the voters failed in a Senate Committee <br /> and was never acted upon. I am enclosing a copy of a portion of <br /> a House Research Department position paper on term limits for <br /> elected offices, dated November of 1993 . In that memo the Hcuse <br /> Research Department indicated that local government offices can <br /> be subject to statutory term limits . This Opinion is consistent <br /> with the Elbers Opinion, as well as the Attorney General' s <br /> Opinion that th_e_Stat_e_Legi_slatur_e s the body which has—the <br /> authority to .lace limitations on holding .local office. <br /> Based upon my research I find no authority for a charter <br /> amendment creating term limits . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.