My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-1994
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
Minutes
>
03-22-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2018 7:16:12 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 7:16:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
3/22/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Burden of proof re petitions: <br /> The commission agreed no changes would be required in the language <br /> proposed for Sec. 5.04, subd. 2. "If the City Council determines on its own motion <br /> that a sufficient and regular petition is determined to be illegal under case law, legal <br /> precedence, or constitutional nonconformity, thereby refusing to submit an initiative <br /> to the voters as provided in this Charter, a court order or injunction permitting the <br /> City Council authority to refuse such election must be produced by the Council <br /> within 15 days of the date of determination of sufficiency. If the Council has not <br /> acted according to this subdivision within the above 15 day period, the sponsoring <br /> committee may appeal to the Charter Commission and the Charter Commission may <br /> provide for said election to be paid by the City. The Clerk-Administrator shall <br /> provide for said election upon the order of a majority vote of the Charter <br /> Commission." This language will be included in the re-draft. <br /> Recall <br /> The draft of recall distributed in the February packet was discussed. The <br /> commission amended the first sentence to read: "The citizens of the City may <br /> request a recall vote of any elected officer of the City by petition." In addition the <br /> grounds for recall in the second sentence shall be limited to "malfeasance," <br /> following the recommendation of attorney David Kennedy. <br /> Section 7.06: <br /> Laurie Schley reviewed her proposed rewording of this section. Following a <br /> discussion of the commission's goals in the budgeting process, the consensus <br /> developed-that-the wording proposed-at the March8thmeeting—should-be-followed. <br /> ----- ---- <br /> ("The budget resolution must show the total revenues and expenditures for each <br /> budgeted fund and each department . . .") <br /> VI. Other Substantive Issues from Charter Re-draft <br /> Julie Trude noted that the commission had not yet reviewed the number of persons <br /> required for a successful petition. She had learned that in the 1992 general election, <br /> the votes cast for mayor totaled 5648 and the votes cast for president totaled 6239. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.