Laserfiche WebLink
4 . <br /> NY <br /> �` 310 Minn. NORTH STERN REPORTER. Zd SERIES oiBc> November 8. 1994 <br /> elected <br /> , ;•4 tai un ts1 including Sulk qualificationsfor which estabhslnes a 8 6 of the Minnesota l• ordinance,artstonY with the to hold <br /> . (ofn• gnka�t d p , ion is without theualifica IS in h .nth per, late- m by the ptarmic <br /> : limitation; <br /> Ilse proms bon. Rather the tYto vote at s <br /> • (emphasis is does o Say the leg;elaa (S of Article XII. Section g, majority <br /> entitled of age le el <br /> limited to considers tg only educations'(Mali- P A a eXII. c sad arcane ergo Years <br /> oth- engages convoluted distinguishsada "qualifies- <br /> went <br /> elective by the p <br /> ` fie spe s.c category. <br /> o . Th or no ment from"eptitigbdity » Nath electswherein he has redid <br /> 'There isn be no trio_esthe on. e <br /> mabout whether the legislature can �- mg in the state constitution itself- our be this les rpt <br /> t elected the qualifications cases. aappos'� <br /> . A.-term <br /> Y �� '�°� this ansiys s of the �, of the United <br /> �' n and therefbte the'Pests- We must afford thecharter presumption of 'n• ' t <br /> t� kind hereto a duly 101100ing "goer <br /> is a qusllf'cato � •L.l _, skt irsese <br /> • t do .., o ed t r o tutionality as we would ly to a u std sets <br /> the pous cas t� 1 legislative tute- WZd 188, <br /> this authority to <br /> 1n �� P99 N. <br /> ' Our previous home rule �extendMinneapolis. In Co"'''"ns .1adin�1� ndents have not even ��n�6,,,a <br /> . State ea eta Twee of Loeaed v City of Csoolc- 'come close to satisfying the substantial bur► The h�o <br /> m'Governing <br /> kind of a4s' rgs:tiu{ <br /> stmt. we said: den of woof applicable to thein its this vvoutd solidatiote. divi.Kiot <br /> cask rule is that, in ve constitutional oblation. Therefore.negative. olida on. d urns <br /> imp home the answer the certified question the change of ba <br /> possessedelective died sspP <br /> sll ttea legislative re of the state.save as such power d. The ANDERSON. Justit a (dissenting)- qualification.*o, <br /> . is expressly• <br /> or impliedly 'contrary I join it the dissent of Justice Gardcbring. fer of muntY <br /> 94 <br /> adoption of any chatter pr at may not uben char <br /> to the Public policy of the state. as peva] <br /> RINGER. Judge. dissenting- - feared urs se <br /> closed by the general laws or its psis dissent. I would answer the d by a antUc <br /> code, is also forbidden I respe� question. <br /> fa„•,� , es to" <br /> cert�e question in the negative.is fts>filled Mit►n-Const art <br /> homeris limited There is no ap Placing like legislature. <br /> It . Coate the Procedural toe+the No- tl or by to 2 b1if <br /> h with snd sub ect to tae � - proper term Lim amendment em I be• Further. <br /> tion fo the state." But these limitations o "saber 8, 199A ballot- COQ ° <br /> • te_ettanaazd of constsds- ms Doty that if t <br /> -_ - -- - ----- • of-d+st'�-Pt'o1°'i- - - the-spps'°� <br /> ' *ions as to eny subjectIlevetimer is the same as the chaster- to impose 4u ' <br /> not forbid the appropriate to the review <br /> fly conduct moi niacipal se ofet. st- apple to a duly enacted legislative stab too does the Cit <br /> those exist- smendmele is presumed ride chartist <br /> mw differ fromute---the proposed 262 <br /> though�' See State v. Hama. � [,cruaeu u Cibe v <br /> fats Renes' ' Wed 81.98 (1958) constitutionst.390 Sole' : Hamams a 91 N 11V 2d Si t <br /> (citations <br /> ibn. + 91 N. N W lis 299 N.Wld 188.. Mike gene <br /> (citations osrdtl+ed). Caa+,m�s "' of •►t�,not be municipal cos <br /> • of a home rule 142{Minn.198D). AecordisB1y, <br /> -St <br /> ` 21+ar the ed IS <br /> o stricken unless the challenging party demon- at <br /> city ate charter <br /> as fvilao+sthat it is in violation of the consd - <br /> e legish <br /> 1) its char provisions must be consis-d beyond a reasonable doubt: See Ham's legislis a U' <br /> } .... with the public policy of the state.and tion2d at 380: In es Tvete�402 N W.2d adoption of <br /> ure of <br /> be in harmo- '�N' City of Richfield it to the pubo <br /> _- ;1 (�xis--�-.-�-- - <br /> tutaon�a Sd 5`1, 553 (Minn.1987): closed by f1 <br /> ny with and stated to the rousts Load No. itis. Intl Asan of Firs Fighters. <br /> W2d•42, 45 (Minn.1979). also f by gt� <br /> Leos of the state. 216 N. to tri <br /> `, o • does rot go so far as VII.4 6 of the Minnesota Constitu- cris <br /> liirzt <br /> suggest <br /> >that the proposed.,�limits-ordi- Articlet for determining t tie . <br /> ggestto a plainly un- tion is the starting pOin a home elnst is rdt <br /> Hance is p contrary c whether the City of Minnenpoles, lace • and er ale <br /> public policy- he Minnesota <br /> i ne because rule charter may. vtAS required to p <br /> dersteod Con- <br /> Artuti XII.Section thoef legislature <br /> ���, peiiants proposed term limits amendment on the state." <br /> stitution authorizes e <br />