Laserfiche WebLink
Page 10 <br />January 13, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />what the private sector is paying. He would really like the staff to look at all of these concerns. He <br />personally feels that any type of salary compensation package should be based more on a merit system. He <br />would like to get some of the staff and the council members together to go over the policy and see if it is indeed <br />in the best interest of the residents. Furthermore, until this is accomplished, he would recommend that the <br />council initiate a hiring freeze of any new employees into the city. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve Resolution 5071, Approving the 1997 Compensation and <br />Insurance Contribution Schedule for Non-Union, Public Works and Park Maintenance Personnel. <br />A discussion followed in regard to the employee health insurance coverage. Mayor McCarty asked if a <br />change could be made to the resolution to state ...shall pay the entire premium for fith-time single health <br />insurance coverage up to $330., which would place the single coverage on the same level as the family <br />coverage. <br />Mr. Kesel explained he believes perhaps the wording needs to be changed slightly. He thinks it should state <br />that there is $330. for insurance per employee and the employee has the option of choosing the insurance plan. <br />He noted that as it now works, an employee can use up to the $330. limit to obtain various insurance (dental, <br />additional life, etc.koverage. <br />Various wording options were discussed to clarify this policy. <br />Ms. Trade stated she would be in favor of voting on the Resolution without making any changes as to the <br />wording for the insurance. This is the same language that has been used for at least the past three years and <br />she feels it is best to leave it intact. Furthermore, it will merely cause unnecessary concern for employees. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Table Resolution No. 5071 to allow staff time to make <br />appropriate revisions. <br />VOTE: 4 ayes 1 nay (Trade) Motion Carried <br />Mr. Kesel noted that he has some concern in tabling the 3 % increase in compensation and would recommend <br />that the council reconsider this. <br />MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to reconsider the tabling of Resolution No. 5071. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nay Motion Catried <br />TABLING MOTION RECONSIDERED: <br />VOTE: 0 ayes 5 nays Motion Failed <br />The council discussed various changes which they felt could be made to Resolution No. 5071. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Koopmeiners to amend Resolution No. 5071 as follows: <br />1) removing "and insurance contribution" from the Resolution title; <br />• 2 removin "and insurance" from the first ara a h• <br />g P ~P <br />