02-10-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 February 10, 1997 i Mounds View City Council Council member Stigney asked that Item C be removed for further discussion. Council member Trude asked that Item F be removed for discussion. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve the Consent Agenda without Items C, F and G. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Discussion on Consent Agenda Items: Mr. Stigney asked how much staff time would be involved and how much work wouid be entailed at this time. Ms. Sheldon explained that a proposal has been developed with the other 3 5 W corridor cities to do a limited number of layers (the comprehensive plan desigQation, the zoning categories, land use) and she is hopeful that those layers could be added this year. As far as additional layers, she felt the city would want to put together an overall game plan. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Trude to approve Item C) Consideration of Resolution No. 5085, Approving a Joint Powers Agreement with the Ramsey County GIS Users Group. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried • Council member Trude had several questions about Item F on the Consent Agenda (Approval of Award of Bid for Well Head Maintenance). She noted a typographical error in the Staff Recommendation portion of the memo (Should Be $19,627.00). She also noted that there were no requests to amend the budget to allow for the additional costs and wondered if this item could be tabled until the next Council meeting. She stated she would prefer that an item such as this be approved in resolution form. Mr. Ulrich explained that he had some concerns delaying the approval of the bid award as a 10-day Notice to Proceed must be given as well. Mr. Kesel explained that the budget amendment and transfers would be done via resolution. MOTIONlSECOND; Trude/Koopmeiners to approve staffs recommendation to award the bid, amending the amount to $19,627. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carned Mr. Whiting noted that Item G of the Consent Agenda was for the approval of hiring a mechanic. Staff was informed today that the Number 1 candidate will not be accepting the position. The Number 2 candidate has not been contacted, but staff would like authorization to offer the position to him, contingent upon him meeting the city's testing requirements. Mr. Ulrich noted that Candidate #2 does not have a DOT Truck Inspection Certificate (something not required but rather desired), but it can be obtained by attending aone-day seminar. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve the hiring of Candidate #2, contingent upon them successfully • completing a physical, alcohol and drug testing and background reference check.