My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1997/03/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Minutes - 1997/03/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:26:10 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 3:37:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/10/1997
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 6 <br />March 10, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Mr. Whiting noted that he had drafted an Advisory Election Question for the Council's review. He noted that a <br />date needs to be established for the election; he is proposing that it be held on Saturday, Apri15, 1997 with <br />voting being allowed at City Hall during normal work hours the two days prior to the election for those who are <br />unable to vote on April 5th. He would also like to set a public informational meeting on the Bel Rae for <br />Wednesday, Apri12, 1997. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he would like some anticipated project costs provided on the ballot form so that <br />residents will have an idea of what the project will cost. He also felt it important to let residents know where <br />the revenues will come from. <br />Council member Trude asked how the election will be paid for. She noted that it was not budgeted for and <br />therefore the council will need to determine a funding source, If a budget amendment is done, a budget <br />resolution will need to be passed, amending the 1997 budget. <br />Mr. Whiting stated he talked with the City Attorney about whether specific fmancial details should be made a <br />part of the ballot. Some concern was addressed about whether the city should do this, realizing that only <br />architectural estimates have been submitted, not actual contractor estimates. Additionally potential revenue <br />sources may not wish to be identified at this point when no agreements have been entered into. In terms of the <br />. ballot, Mr. Whiting noted that he experienced difficulty knowing whether he should present the question in <br />concept form or in actual estimated numbers. He feels much of the financial information could be presented <br />in greater detail at the informational meeting and through a mailing to the residents. <br />Steve Bubul, City Attorney stated the council must remember that the purpose of the election is strictly <br />advisory to allow for feedback. The council needs to consider how good the feedback will be if number are <br />provided that look very precise and then the final project ends up being different than that. Additionally, the <br />city will still be negotiating contracts and leases and they must be careful not to jeopardize negotiations by <br />adding specific rent numbers on the actual ballots. Some caution must be taken to ensure that the city does <br />not bind itself. He feels voters need to be provided with as much information as possible, however it must be <br />done cautiously. Background information such as mailings could provide a better explanation of the current <br />estimates, which he feels would be different than having numbers on the ballot and having residents vote on <br />particular numbers. <br />William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, wondered why the information couldn't just be provided on the ballot <br />form with a clarification that the numbers are only estimates. <br />Council member Stigney suggested that ballots be sent out to residents along with the informational mailing if <br />the council is concerned about the cost of two mailings. He also noted that some "not to exceed" cost could <br />be provided on the fmancial information. Mr. Stigney stated he also would like the information to include the <br />loss of tax base incurred from the city now owning the Bel Rae property. <br />Naja Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road asked if there will be anything on the ballot to indicate if the residents will <br />pay more in property taxes if the community center is approved. <br />Mr. Whiting stated the concept has been to insulate the city tax base from having to incur any increase in taxes <br />for the community center. The city is currently looking at spending Tax Increment Financing funds to cover the <br />up front construction of the project. Once the work is done, the city will not have any debt on the building but <br />will need to maintain it. However, the tenants involved would pay an annual lease for a period of time to help <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.