Laserfiche WebLink
Page 10 <br />April 28, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />R .~ , <br />~_ t : <br />. ~ • <br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ <br />added improvements. He provided informatia~n in regard to the proposed monthly rents for the units, noting <br />that they would range from $509/month for a one bedroom unit to $720/month for a four bedroom unit <br />Lori DanZeisen, President of DanZeisen Properties, was present to provide information in regard to <br />management of the property. <br />Marie Donahue, 2622 Lake Court Drive, stated she is aware that managers and owners of rental units often <br />don't have any rights when it comes to rental eater tions, etc. She wondered how Ms. DaaZ,eisen would be able <br />to overcome this. <br />i <br />Ms. DanZeisen explained that she has a detailed screening process that she goes through and feels that it <br />provides the information necessary in making decisions in the selection process. <br />Council member Stigney asked if the triangular single family Property would require rezoning as well. <br />Mr. Pinkerton stated they would propose that the R-1 zoning on that property would be included in the PUD. <br />They are planning to keep the single family home there. <br />Council member Trude asked how many residents they anticipate in the entire development She wondered <br />how this may impact the schools. <br />Mr. Pinkerton stated he thinks a majority of the units will be filled by Mounds View residents as there are no <br />other rental townhomes in Mounds View. <br />Arnold Winters, 7831 Sunnyside Road stated his property abuts the proposed development on two sides. He <br />would like to see the property improved and is is favor of the proposed development <br />Mike Coon, 7851 Eastwood Road, stated he does not think residents across the street will want to look out to <br />the two-story townhomes. Additionally, he heard that the developers plan to use the single family home as a <br />rental office. This would increase the traffic in the area and affect the property values in the area as well as <br />child safety. <br />Mr. Pinkerton explained that the house will not be a rental office. There would be no access onto Eastwood, <br />therefore he cannot anticipate a traffic increase there. <br />Mike Strauss, 7830 Eastwood Rd., stated he is opposed to tripling the number of people on the block by <br />building high density housing there. Additionally, he wondered why the city couldn't force the landlord of the <br />Property to make improvements. <br />Attorney Long explained that in order to force a landlord to make improvements, they would need to determine <br />that the property failed to meet housing code. He noted that approving the resolutions would only preserve <br />options and would allow the city to go forward. They do not obligate the city in any way. <br />Council member Trude stated she does not like the process of proceeding any further without community input <br />Mayor McCarty stated this does not tie the city into proceeding if they later determine that it is not in the best <br />interests of the community. <br />• <br />• <br />