Laserfiche WebLink
Pagel ~ ~~ ~f <br />• A ri128 1997 ~ ~ <br />P <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Mayor McCarty stated he has a copies of the Section 9 Study, the Comprehensive Plan and the Highway 10 <br />shady. These are the city's dreams, however, his intentions as well as the others in the city, in terms of what <br />they want the community to be, must be weigh with the full knowledge of their constitutional rights in the <br />hands of property owners. The city cannot tell owners what they are going to put on their property, <br />and they can only negotiate through the PUD process. <br />MOTION by Stigney to amend the previous motion that the results of the Highway 10 U of MN Corridor Study <br />be addressed prior to the second reading of ce No. 599. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF SECOND. <br />Joanne Meyers, Silver Lake Wood Townhomes, ted she had concerns with traffic problems which may occur <br />with those who are attempting to make a left hand turn off of Highway 10 to the gas station during rush hour <br />traffic. She also is concerned about the wetlands. She felt a lot of drainage off the area would affect the <br />wetland She wondered if caning change could change the type of traffic in the area. <br />Dan Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, asked why Senior Citizen housing was being proposed when there is a <br />large senior complex being constructed on Highway 10 in Spring Lake Park Mayor McCarty noted that there <br />is a high demand for that type of housing in the area. <br />John Adair of Faegre & Bensoq stated he is somewhat concerned about the 120 day limitation. He feels the <br />• city should proceed with a second reading and count on the Exhibit 1 as addressing all of the concerns which <br />must be satisfied before the development stage is approved. <br />Mayor McCarty stated noted that the Ordinance cannot even be enforced unti160 days have passed under the <br />Charter requirements, He views the motion as a double check to see that those concerns are indeed <br />addressed. He also is concerned about the 120 daytime limit <br />Attorney Long noted that what the Council is being asked to do is an alternative method of considering <br />reaoning. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />PUB .i(' HF,ARiNiGS -con •nued• <br />First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No. 600, to Consider Amending the Assessment Policy. <br />Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:15 p.m <br />Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director, explained that at the Apri17,1997 City Council Work Sessioq several <br />revisions were recommended to the assessment policy. He noted that the primary revisions are for the storm <br />sewer assessment and one revision to the assessment for corner industrial and commercial property. He noted <br />that copies of the excerpts of the assessment policy were included in the agenda packets. He proceeded to go <br />through the changes. <br />Gregg Lien, Midway Industrial Supply, stated they would be dramatically affected by the Ordinance as it now <br />stands, as they have frontage on Mustang. They do not rely on traffic coming off Mustang, therefore <br />• the frontage would be of no benefit to them He urged the Council to consider the new amended ordinance. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 9:24 p.m <br />