Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 05 <br /> Meeting Date: 01/12/04 <br /> Type of Business: CA <br /> • City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator <br /> Item Title/Subject: Charter Commission Outstanding Issues <br /> There are several outstanding issues in regard to the Charter Commission for Council <br /> consideration: <br /> 1) At the November 24, 2003 Council meeting there were several <br /> questions in regard to current structure of the Charter Commission <br /> and whether they have been properly conducting business. For <br /> example, was any business conducted without a quorum and was <br /> the change in membership from 15 to 11 members done properly? <br /> In response to these issues, the Chair of the Charter Commission, <br /> Jonathan Thomas, has submitted a response that is attached. Also, <br /> Duane McCarty has written that, he"personally wrote the petition for <br /> appointment of a Charter Commission . . ."and that it"did not include <br /> a specific number of Commission members to be appointed. . ." <br /> The City Attorney has advised that without information establishing a <br /> • specific number of members, the judge may establish the <br /> Commission with 7 to 15 members, as provided by State statute. <br /> The Attorney also advises that the Commission itself may determine <br /> what constitutes a quorum for its meetings. Scott Riggs is drafting a <br /> written response outlining his position that will be distributed at the <br /> work session. <br /> 2) Two Charter Commission Resolutions were presented for Council <br /> Consideration at the November 24, 2003 Council meeting. Action on <br /> these items was postponed until the above issue was reviewed. If <br /> the Council agrees with the proposed amendments, staff may be <br /> directed to prepare the proper ordinance amendments for Council <br /> consideration. Proposed revisions to the Charter are to sections <br /> 2.06, 4.05, 9.01, and section 5 in its entirety (see attached). The <br /> City Attorney has expressed concern about the recall language in <br /> Section 5 due to recent court decisions. <br /> 3) Also included is a letter from the Charter Commission dated May <br /> 8, 2003 (see attached) in regard to the existence of an appointed <br /> commission (i.e., the Police Civil Service Commission)that serves an <br /> administrative role. The Charter Commission requested that the <br /> Council take action to correct the apparent conflict with the Charter <br /> via a code amendment or abolishment of the Police Civil Service <br /> Commission. <br /> 111 <br />