Laserfiche WebLink
regressive. Prior to 1965 school bond and tax referenda passed almost automatically over the <br /> entire country and in fact, in many cases the people put them on the ballot to counteract un- . . <br /> willing legislatures and local governments.10 This was viewed by many as being progressive. - <br /> Now, however, the trend to defeat these measures has been growing. This is seen as regressive. <br /> Oregonians voted down a cigarette tax three times and then later switched and voted twice to - <br /> ax- their- sale. MostII people would agree that the legislature was ahead of. the .people - - - <br /> • <br /> Minority or Majority Rule <br /> • <br /> Another controversy concerns whether I and R lets a minority of the citizenry <br /> legislate for the rest. <br /> • <br /> One studyll indicates that there is usually a drop in the number of people who <br /> vote on either initiative or referendum measures when compared to the number of people who v'bte <br /> for candidates for high office, such as governor or president. The study did not state how <br /> these percentages compare to the vote for candidates for other state office, such as secretary <br /> of state, attorney general, treasurer, etc. The trend is that voter interest declines with <br /> the importance of the office. , <br /> It is possible that because of apathy a very small minority can legislate for <br /> the majority. This is particularly true in special elections called to vote on one referendum <br /> and frequently happens at the county and municipal levels. <br /> Enforcing and Financing <br /> If there is insufficient popular support or if there is opposition from the <br /> legislature or executive, will a law passed by direct legislation be enforceable? <br /> • <br /> None of the studies indicated any evidence of overt effort by government to <br /> subvert laws enacted by the people nor did they indicate that enforcement is a problem, or at <br /> least no moreso than with laws passed by legislatures. The various laws against gambling, <br /> prostitution; drinking, etc. , whether passed by the people or by governmental bodies, have- all <br />- -- run -into problems of enforcement when a large percentage of people disagree with them, - <br /> 4111 • <br /> . - When measures involving substantial appropriations are proposed, problems can <br /> - -ariseas to where the money will come from. In extreme- cases,-initiatives could- have:spelled <br /> financial disaster for the state if they had not been rejected by the people, ruled unconsti- <br /> tutional, or overturned by an overwhelming vote of the legislature. - <br /> • <br /> In most states, financing is handled as it would be for a bill passed by the <br /> legislature. Another method is that used by Nevada, which requires that any initiative which <br /> calls for appropriation or otherwise spends money must also provide for raising-the money by <br /> tax or other means. - <br /> Complexity of Issues <br /> 0 <br /> Proponents of I and R feel that the groups proposing or opposing- direct legis- <br /> lation may be as well informed, and perhaps more so, than the legislature. They point out <br /> .- that in most- cases the legislature enacts laws that have been studied thoroughly by only a - - <br /> few people'-and that legislators, often rushed and tired, can -rarely- devote- -the time-and :energy- --- -- . <br /> - required to study every issue in depth. Special interest groups, -they say, can and do devote - <br /> themselves to one issue and be expert on it. . <br /> - - Even though sponsors. o.f a measure offer a take it br leave it package, I and R - <br /> supporters-.feel' that modifications and compromises have usually already- been made by the ini- _• <br /> tiating group. They believe that the campaign itself will educate voters on the issue and <br /> stimulate debate and public interest. Minority opinion, they say, will have an opportunity • <br /> to state its case and take it to the public. They also point out that voters are usually <br /> - consistent even when faced with similar or conflicting measures on the same ballot, although <br /> opponents of I and R disagree and say that in some cases--voters have been- inconsistent,4 <br /> Proponents say there is no evidence to support the charge that voters tire or I <br /> become confused when faced with a long ballot because initiative measures receive great voter <br /> response although they are usually placed. at -the bottom of the ballot. They feel that though <br />- -- a-majority •of initiatives fail, it is not because the voters became-tired- or--confused-but <br /> --- -- - <br /> because they doubted the merits of the measure. <br /> $ 'a <br /> • <br />