Laserfiche WebLink
• Page 3 <br />August 11, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Sewer and Water -Expires June 30. 1998 <br />Kuehn Excavating -New <br />MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. <br />VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: <br />Acting Mayor Koopmeiners explained that this is the time for residents to address the council with concerns on <br />items that are not on the Agenda. <br />Ms. Pamela Sheldon, 7640 Woodlawn Drive, took this opportunity to thank the City Council, Planning <br />Commission, city staff and residents for the opportunity to work with such a fine group of people over the past <br />year. She noted that it has indeed been one of the best experiences of her career. <br />Mr. Whiting read a plaque which he then presented to Ms. Sheldon on behalf of the City Council, <br />acknowledging her for her dedicated service to the City of Mounds View. <br />• William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, asked if the $230,000 Tax Increment Financing Loan which MSP Real <br />Estate is requesting as a part of the Silver Lake Commons Project is a deferred interest loan. <br />Mr. Whiting explained that it is a loan with a deferred payment, having a 1 % annually incurred interest with a <br />balloon payment at the end of the 30-year term. <br />Mr. Werner stated if MSP Real Estate paid $2,000 per year interest over 30 years, it would amount to <br />$60,000. ff the $230,000 were invested it could double within 15 years. It seems to him that this is a very <br />good deal for the developer and he feels it would be helpful for the Council to explain this more thoroughly to <br />the residents. <br />Bruce Braesele, 5127 Long Lake Road, stated as a Planning Commissioner he voted in favor of Silver Lake <br />Commons as he had no legal basis for not doing so. As a resident, however, he opposes the project as he feels <br />Mounds View has an adequate number of low-income housing units, with a higher percentage than any other <br />suburb in the Twin Cities area. Furthermore, he was not aware that the developer would be asking for Tax <br />Increment Financing in addition to obtaining a grant from the City of Minneapolis. Taking this into <br />consideration, he wonders how much risk the developer is really taking and therefore how much interest they <br />really have in the project. He also has some concern with this particular developer as they seem to want to <br />"railroad" this development through. He stated he feels the city would be better off strictly enforcing the <br />housing codes which would force the owners to make necessary improvements to the existing apartments. He <br />feels perhaps if a "for sale" townhouse project were put in the area, residents would take more of an interest in <br />their property. As a resident, he is strongly opposed to the project. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated he has a lot of reservations as to the Silver Lake Commons <br />development project as well. He is not sure that grouping low income families together in a development is <br />really helping those families. He also wondered why the public hearing for the development project was not <br />. published in the Focus or the New Brighton Bulletin newspapers. It appears that the notice was only <br />published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press. In regard to the city's inability to market the property commercially, <br />he does not feel that one year is a significant time to have commercial property on the market. He asked that <br />