Laserfiche WebLink
• Page 4 <br />September 22, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />established trailway that the city can hook up to). The residents want to know why the turnback money is not <br />applied to the project. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, wondered if the Resolution establishing the road requirements in Mounds <br />View was still in place. Mayor McCarty stated this is still part of the policy and that the minimum road width <br />in Mounds View is 30 feet. Mr. Jahnke wondered if the policy would need to be changed. Mayor McCarty <br />stated he believes the Council could authorize that project by their majority motion and he does not believe the <br />policy binds the Council in a legal fashion. However, he would encourage the council to review the policy to <br />see if changes need to be made. <br />Brian Kaden, 7675 Spring Lake Road, stated he lives on the corner of the Spring Lake Road/County Road I <br />intersection. He stated he has observed that less than 50% of the drivers ever acknowledge the stop signs on <br />the corner. Something needs to be done as this tends to be a confusing intersection. Perhaps the city could <br />paint a cross walk for the kids so that they can cross the road to go to the lake. <br />Cameron Obert, 8315 Greenwood Drive, stated he was against the standard road width of 30 feet. The wider <br />the streets are made, the faster the cars travel. He feels the City Council needs to review the standard road <br />width and look at how the assessments are made for mad reconstruction or road improvements. All streets in <br />the city age and need repair and he is not sure that it is fair for Ramsey County funds to be applied only to <br />County Roads. <br />Mayor McCarty stated that County roads do take a lot of collector and bus traffic. It was generally felt that the <br />county should pay for the county roads because they serve a county purpose. While the turnback program is <br />bringing those county roads back into the authority of the city, Mayor McCarty stated he does not see the <br />function changing that greatly. <br />Mayor McCarty suggested that the Council take the assessment policy under advisement at their earliest <br />opportunity. It was suggested that this be done at the October 6th Work Session, along with the feasibility <br />study. Mayor McCarty stated he would like to get more information on the project itself prior to that meeting. <br />B. (1.) Consideration of Resolution No. 5165, Resolution Designating Mounda View City Hall as the <br />Temgorat Polling Location for the November 4,1997 Special Election. <br />Mr. Kesel noted that the Bel Rae Ballroom is presently undergoing construction and therefore the polling <br />place will need to be changed. A mailing will be sent out to all registered voters notifying them of this change. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No. 5165, Resolution Designating Mounds <br />View City Hall as the Temporary Polling Location for the November 4, 1997 Special Election. <br />VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carved <br />B. Consideration of Resolution No. 5163, Approving the Refinancing of the 1991)N~re Bonds. <br />Mr. Kesel noted that in 1991 the City of Mounds View, along with the cities of Blaine and Spring Lake Park <br />issued a joint bond issue to pay for improvements at several of the fire hall locations. Over the past several <br />years there has been a change in the bond markets and at this point it would be advantageous for the city to <br />refinance. Based upon the bids that came in, the estimated savings for the City of Mounds View would be <br />approximately $318,000, which will be recognized in the years 2001 through 2012. <br />