Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> <br />• <br />Page 3 <br />November 10, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />~ ' J ,7 <br />Acting Mayor Koopmeiners aye <br />Council member Quick aye <br />Council member Stigney aye <br />Motion Carried (3-0) <br />2. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 606, An Ordinance Amending Cable Franchise Ordinance No. <br />319, Article II, Section 4, Franchise Term. <br />Mr. Whiting explained that this item was discussed at a recent Council Work Session as well as the last <br />Council meeting. The existing Cable TV Franc}rise Agreement expires soon and there will be a time lapse <br />until the new Agreement goes into effect. Therefore it is necessary for the City to extend the term of the <br />existing agreement to January 1998. Staff expects that the new agreement will be in place by that time and it <br />will be brought back to the Council at that time. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 606, An Ordinance <br />Amending Cable Franchise Ordinance No. 319, Article II, Section 4, Franchise Term, and to waive the <br />reading. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />Acting Mayor Koopmeiners: aye <br />Council member Quick: aye <br />Council member Stigney: aye <br />Motion Carried (3-0) <br />3. Follow-up Discussion of HVAC System at City HaLL <br />Mr. Ulrich, Director of Public Works, explained that the City Hall building experienced a heating problem . <br />today which was resolved, however some decisions will need to be made in regard to repair of the air <br />conditioning units and roof. He noted that the roof has anumber of holes/leaks which should be repaired as <br />soon as possible. He will be obtaining some cost estimates for these spot repairs. He explained that all air <br />conditioning unit repairheplacement options include re-roofing the building. Staff would like to obtain input <br />from the Council as to how much they feel is economically feasible to put into the building. <br />Council member Quick noted that the options basically include replacing the existing units or go with a higher <br />tech system and he would suggest that staff be directed to look at both of these options and get some figures on <br />what it will cost to replace the bad units and what it would cost for a better system. <br />Mr. Ulrich noted that the minimal repairs necessary would range fi om $30,000 to $44,000 which would <br />include the replacement of three defective units and patching of the roof. <br />A discussion followed It was the general consensus of the council members that the roof repairs must be made <br />as soon as possible. It is roughly estimated that this will cost beiween $3,000 and $5,000. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/5tigney to direct staff to proceed with getting bids for roof repairs not to exceed <br />$10,000, and to execute such contract as required (Mayor's signature). <br />