Laserfiche WebLink
• Page 6 <br />December 15, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />APPROVED <br />Mr. Whiting noted that he had collected information as requested by the Council at their last meeting in regard <br />to other options for the Council Retreat. He noted that it will be necessary to get input from the Council as to <br />what they want to achieve at this retreat. <br />Council member Stigney stated he felt the estimate from Carl Neu was rather high. Many of the things have <br />already been accomplished -goal settings, mission statements, etc. -and he feels the city should continue where <br />they left off last year. If the Council sets the agenda, perhaps they could conduct it themselves. <br />Mr. Whiting stated he feels that last year's session helped get the Council and staff familiar with each other as <br />individuals and the types of leadership styles of each. The Council should perhaps consider what went. well <br />and what did not go well in 1997 and tailor some type of program towards that. He thinks the difficulty is in <br />completing the mission statements when facing reality. <br />Council member Quick felt it would be beneficial to have the same facilitator as the city used last year. <br />Mayor McCarty stated team building requires an outside interest. He is in favor of utilizing the same facilitator <br />but would encourage him to be more forceful in terms of team building. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to direct staff to approach Mr. Salverda on a team building session <br />and report back on prices for both one day and 1-1/2 day sessions. <br />i VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />It was recommended that the session should get away from the general presentations and have the council <br />provide input on what they want covered so that those issues can be addressed. <br />8. Staff Briefing on Administration Efforts for Evaluating Assessment Policy Options and Engineering <br />Policy Option regarding Street Construction Project. <br />Mr. Whiting noted that he had met with Bruce Kessel and Mike Ulrich in regard to how to outline the various <br />aspects of a project. Additionally, Steve Campbell from SEH was present for input. He noted that Mr. Kesel <br />is currently working on some of the long-teen fiscal implications of various options. Mike Ulrich was able to <br />evaluate some of the road conditions in the city regarding long-term capital improvements. It is his desire to <br />get this item on the agenda for further discussion at the January 5th work session. <br />Council member Stigney asked if the city has ever looked at Assessment Policies of other comparable <br />municipalities. Mr. Whiting noted that this is something that could be done. <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, asked if residents would have the opportunity to give input at the January <br />5th meeting. Residents would like to hear all of the facts and information. Perhaps it would be beneficial to <br />schedule an additional work session to address the residents concerns. Mayor McCarty noted that there are <br />many issues which will need to be resolved before a decision can be made as to the street improvement project <br />on County Road USpring Lake Road. A discussion followed in regard to the possibility of obtaining a MSA <br />variance. Ms. Haake noted that the residents really do not want the MSA standards applied to the street. <br />9. Consideration of Resolution No. 5173, Resolution Approving the Wetland Alteration Permit for <br />• Lots 17 and 18, Edgewood Square, Requested by Good Value Homes. <br />