Laserfiche WebLink
process prescribed by Minnesota State Statutes, it would not pose an undue burden on <br /> the court. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> By proceeding in the manner in which the Mayor and the City Council have, the <br /> City of Mounds View has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in determining what might <br /> be in the City's best interests. State statute has not been followed and Mounds View <br /> residents, and the Mounds View Charter Commission on behalf the residents', have not <br /> been afforded opportunity to properly review, discuss and offer input into possible <br /> changes in their form of Charter and governmental operation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs <br /> request that the Court issue a temporary injunction preventing the City of Mounds View <br /> from allowing Ordinances 661 and 662 being placed on a ballot offered to the residents <br /> of the City of Mounds View until the Mounds View Charter Commission is afforded <br /> opportunity to review and consider the issues being proposed in Ordinances 661 and <br /> 662, in accordance with Minn. Stat. Section 410.12, Subd. 5, and at such time as this <br /> process is complete, that any proposed Ordinances or Charter amendments be placed <br /> on the ballot for consideration. <br /> Respectfully submitted on behalf of The Mounds View Charter Commission By: <br /> Dated: This of / —Day of October, 2000 <br /> Jonathan J Th- as <br /> Memorandum Page 6 of 6 <br />