Commission vs City of Mounds View Ramsey Court

Home Browse Search

5. The contents of the amendments proposed by Ordinances 661 and 662 were never discussed during any City Council meetings or work sessions, nor was the Charter Commission allowed the time for review and therefore procedure, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 410.12, Subd.4., was not followed by the City of Mounds View. WHEREFORE Plaintiffs request the following relief: 1. That this Court issue a mandatory injunction directing the City of Mounds View to submit the Ordinances 661 and 662 to the Charter Commission for review and comment prior to presenting them to the voters of the City of Mounds View. 2. That the City of Mounds View be enjoined from placing Ordinances 661 and 662 on the ballot for the November 7, 2000 General Election. 3. For such further relief as is just and equitable. Respectfully submitted on behalf of The Mounds View Charter Commission By: r foam 5,41 — Dated: This air �Day of October, 2000 � � ��• ' Jonathan J Th• as ACKNOWLEDGMENT Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 549.21, Subd.1, the undersigned hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 549.21, Subd.2, costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded the opposing party or parties in this litigation if the court should find that the undersigned acted in bad faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that is costly to the other party, asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the ordinary course of the proceedings or to harass, or committed a fraud upon the court. Respectfully submitted on behalf of The Mounds View Charter Commission By: f 411110 Dated: This,47 Day of October, 2000 - �� ice/ Jonathan J T omas 2