My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2004
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Minutes
>
02-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 5:55:26 AM
Creation date
9/11/2018 5:55:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Charter Commission February 12,2004 <br /> • Mounds View Charter Commission Minutes <br /> Meeting February 12, 2004 <br /> 1. Call to order - The meeting came to order at 7:05 PM <br /> 2. Roll Call—Present-B. Amundsen, B. Mori, J. Miller,M. Sandback, B. Thomas, <br /> J. Thomas <br /> Absent—D.Friemuth, William Werner, Sr. <br /> Excused - B. Doty, M. Eenigenburg <br /> 3. Approval of agenda and minutes <br /> Motion by B. Mori, second by B. Thomas to approve agenda as written <br /> UNAMIMOUS APPROVAL <br /> Motion by B. Mori, second J. Miller; to approve minutes of January 8, 2004 as <br /> amended in 8.b. Replacing "offered to help"with "recommend we" and with <br /> grammatical corrections in 8.c of"adapt" and replace "Consensus was to"with <br /> "Consensus was the" <br /> UNAMIMOUS APPROVAL <br /> 4. Citizens comments from the floor <br /> • None presented. <br /> 5. Reports of the Chair <br /> Chair J. Thomas reported on his meeting at council work session, on February <br /> 2, 2004,with Council members. Council members present agreed to review <br /> suggested charter language clarifications submitted to date at next council meeting. <br /> Chair Thomas expects that the Chapter 5 rewrite will be sent back for clarification of <br /> the "recall" issue, which the courts have found "unconstitutional" in other charters. <br /> City attorney also clarified at this work session that City Council can approve by <br /> ordinance as written, approve by ordinance with minor grammar corrections, or return <br /> for suggested modifications, but they cannot reject and simply not act. Charter <br /> Commission can then take issue to ballot if necessary. <br /> 6. Reports of members <br /> B. Amundsen requested clarification of 2004 time line for the "category 3" <br /> items which were designated as items that might require ballot presentation. Chair J. <br /> Thomas accepted task to draft a time line for review at March Commission meeting. <br /> '7. Unfinished Business <br /> Nothing presented. <br /> 8. New Business <br /> a. Review final resolution 2004-01 for Charter Section 4.02. <br /> • Motion by B. Mori, second by M. Sandback to approve. <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.