My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1998/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Minutes - 1998/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 10:09:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1998
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 7 <br />April 27, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: <br />Quick/Stigney to continue the Public Hearing on May 11, 1998. <br />VOTE: 2 ayes 2 nays (Koopmeiners/ McCarty) Motion Fails <br />Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 7:42 p.m. <br />Carol Arel, 7750 Greenwood Drive, presented a petition containing almost 200 signatures in opposition to <br />the project and to the re-zoning of residential property for commercial use. She noted that there will be <br />many residents affected by the rezoning of the property by an increase in traffic, safety concerns and <br />property value issues. She noted that the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City <br />Council based on what they "think" the new comprehensive plan will include in part. She personally <br />spoke with Dick Thompson at Metropolitan Council and he indicated that the Planning Commission is not <br />allowed to consider in this decision what the new comprehensive plan might be. The amendment request <br />therefore needs to be considered based on the current comprehensive plan. She has read the city's current <br />comprehensive plan and it states that residential development is and will continue to be the primary type of <br />land use development within the community and that low density, single family neighborhoods are to be <br />preserved. She does not feel that a development of this type is a preservation of residential areas. Ms. <br />Arel noted goals contained in the comprehensive plan which she feels are in direct opposition to this type <br />of development. In regard to traffic, the only traffic study that they have seen to date, indicates a 40% <br />increase in traffic daily on Greenwood Drive to over 750 cars. Critical portions of this project have fallen <br />apart and she wonders why it has continued. <br />Other concerns expressed by Ms. Arel included the possibility of a 24-hour pharmacy at Wallgreens, the <br />fact that the project size is less than five acres (city code 1120.03) which is in direct violation of code, the <br />proposal does not fit into the current code requirements, and that many residents did not receive copies of <br />the notice of Public Hearing. She also stated a concern about developers trying to pressure residents into <br />supporting the project. She asked that the Council consider what is best for the residents of Mounds <br />View. <br />Kathy Piche', 2204 Lois Drive, stated that for some residents their dream homes are being changed by this <br />development. She personally will not be directly affected however she has concerns as it very well could <br />be her neighborhood. She asked that the Council consider leaving the residential neighborhoods as they <br />are and to continue to provide the sense of privacy and security that each citizen deserves. <br />Janet Wilcox, 7815 Eastwood Road, noted that the developer of the townhome project in the area has <br />shown some interest in this particular parcel of land. She is concerned that he may come in with a proposal <br />for the corner if this development is not approved. Residents feel they basically have a choice between a <br />drugstore at the end of the street or more townhomes. She feels this may be why the Council has not heard <br />from very many residents on Eastwood. The proposal does not paint Mounds View as afamily-friendly <br />place. <br />Jodi Johnson, 7870 Greenwood Drive, stated she is appalled at how the council and staff have been <br />working with this development plan. Residents have indicated their opposition since the beginning and <br />she feels proceeding with the project is a blatant disregard for the residents' feelings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.