My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1998/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Minutes - 1998/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 10:09:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1998
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 9 <br />Apri127, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Crystal Wilson, 7764 Greenwood Drive, stated she cannot believe that the community is willing to open <br />another business and jeopardize the Snyders store in the process. She asked that council members <br />consider what this will do to her property. <br />With no further comments from the public, Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:29 p.m. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he feels the city acted appropriately and done the best job possible in getting the <br />Public Hearing notices out to residents. If residents did not receive a public notice on of the hearing at <br />their home and are in the designated affected area, it is possible that the notice went to the owner of record. <br />If residents have purchased their homes on a Contract for Deed or if there is another owner on the title, it <br />is likely that they received the notice. He noted that staff will continue to try to improve on this in the <br />future by making all mail notices duplicate in the case of anon-resident owner. Notices are published in <br />the local newspapers as well. The city does everything in their power to get information out to the public, <br />including televising of all council meetings. Residents must take responsibility as well to read the notices <br />and keep themselves informed. <br />Mayor McCarty noted that the council and staff are bound by state law and the residents' constitutional <br />rights to apply the laws equally and without bias. He provided information in regard to the townhouse <br />project which was recently approved by the council. The developer of that project had indicated his <br />• interest in the city's vacant lot on the corner of Eastwood and Highway 10 as well as a long term loan. In <br />the process, and in consideration of the public's opposition, two council members asked if the council could <br />look at another use for the city's property which would presumably work better as a commercial property. <br />At that time, it was decided to allow another use for that property to be pursued. Subsequent to that, the <br />city received a proposal which involved the residential homes. The City Council and Planning <br />Commission have been proceeding in the direction of what they understood that the community wished to <br />see. <br />Mr. Bob Cunningham, Vice President of Development for TOLD Development, stated it is obvious that <br />there is a preponderance in the community against this project. They came into the community thinking <br />that they would be adding a retail store at the busiest intersection in Mounds View. They paid the <br />homeowners what they believed to be a fair price for the property and worked out arrangements with <br />adjacent property owners to allow them to litigate for the what they believed to be negative impact to their <br />property. They worked with staff and the Planning Commission to comply with their requests, and he <br />stated it has never been their intention to cause contention in the neighborhood. They are willing to abide <br />by the Council's decision. <br />Mayor McCarty explained that the proposal includes a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to <br />change the land use from high and low density residential to neighborhood commercial. Neither the <br />Comprehensive Plan nor the City Code currently provide for a Neighborhood Commercial classification. <br />A drugstore would fall under B-3 classification which is not a neighborhood oriented code classification. <br />He would suggest that the Council consider a substitute resolution of denial rather than the resolution of <br />approval. Copies of the proposed resolution were distributed to the council members and Mayor McCarty <br />took the opportunity to read this resolution. <br />. MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution No. 5216, denying the request for a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Properties Located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.