Laserfiche WebLink
Page 9 <br />May 11, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Dan Johnson, 7359 Park View Terrace, noted that within one block of the theater project, there are deaf <br />and blind residents. With the steady increase in traffic on County Road H-2, he has concerns in the safety <br />of these children and asked the Council to consider this when voting on this issue. <br />Al Gregerson, 7366 Park View Terrace, asked where the cars exiting onto H-2 will go. Also, there will <br />also be an increase in pedestrian traffic. If the stop sign remains at County Road H-2 and Long Lake and <br />there are 50 cars turning onto Highway 10, it will cause a backup. He believes there will be a greater <br />traffic impact than what is predicted. <br />Tracy Swig, 5292 Edgewood Drive, stated she would like to invite the mayor to come to her home from <br />2:00 to 4:30 p.m. and see the number of students walking along Edgewood. She believes these are safety <br />concerns that the Council needs to look at. <br />Kelly Rosenthal, 2425 Ridge Lane, stated prior to Thursday's meeting, the residents on her street were not <br />informed of the meetings on this development. She stated she cannot understand how the traffic consultant <br />estimated an additiona150 cars per hour on County Road H-2. <br />Mr. Jopke explained that the traffic engineer predicted that the vast majority of the patrons will use the <br />Highway 10 entrance. The peak hours are 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. <br />Mayor McCarty noted that residents within a designated distance of the proposed development are notified <br />in writing of the Public Hearings in regard to the project. Additionally, the Public Hearings are published <br />in the local newspapers. <br />Council member Stigney stated that he has taken the entire community into consideration in his stand on <br />this issue. Additionally, he plans to listen to the residents, as he promised. The cost of the re-alignment of <br />Edgewood should be covered by the developer. He would like the Council to consider a 50/50 split on the <br />costs between the city and the developer. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn to Amend the motion to state that 50% of the cost of the re-alignment <br />of Edgewood and the signalized intersection and associated costs be paid for by the developer. <br />VOTE: 2 ayes 3 nays (McCarty/Koopmeiners/Quick) Motion Fails <br />MOTION by Stigney to table any action on Resolution No. 5226 until after the pending petition is <br />resolved. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br />VOTE ON AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 5226: <br />4 ayes 1 nay (Stigney) Motion Carried <br />Mayor McCarty recessed the meeting. <br />The meeting was reconvened at 9:25 p.m. <br />• <br />